PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IESC vs. IRTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IESC vs. IRTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) and iRhythm Technologies, Inc. (IRTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IESC achieves a 92.75% return, which is significantly higher than IRTC's -35.95% return.


IESC

1D
2.53%
1M
10.63%
YTD
92.75%
6M
62.95%
1Y
175.21%
3Y*
139.60%
5Y*
70.53%
10Y*
48.97%

IRTC

1D
0.87%
1M
-0.88%
YTD
-35.95%
6M
-32.68%
1Y
-21.88%
3Y*
3.87%
5Y*
12.21%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IESC vs. IRTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IESC
IES Holdings, Inc.
92.75%93.58%153.67%122.72%-29.76%9.99%79.42%65.02%-9.86%-9.92%
IRTC
iRhythm Technologies, Inc.
-35.95%96.78%-15.76%14.27%-20.41%-50.39%248.38%-2.00%23.96%86.83%

Correlation

The correlation between IESC and IRTC is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2016

0.24

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IESC:

$15.14B

IRTC:

$3.69B

EPS

IESC:

$18.85

IRTC:

-$0.85

PS Ratio

IESC:

4.17

IRTC:

4.69

PB Ratio

IESC:

14.11

IRTC:

22.92

Total Revenue (TTM)

IESC:

$3.63B

IRTC:

$787.85M

Gross Profit (TTM)

IESC:

$931.31M

IRTC:

$559.39M

EBITDA (TTM)

IESC:

$487.14M

IRTC:

-$3.10M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IESC vs. IRTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IESC
IESC Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
IESC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IESC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
IESC Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
IESC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
IESC Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

IRTC
IRTC Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
IRTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRTC Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
IRTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRTC Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IESC vs. IRTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) and iRhythm Technologies, Inc. (IRTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IESCIRTCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

0.94

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.09

-0.49

+8.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.98

-0.99

+23.97

IESC vs. IRTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IESC Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is higher than the IRTC Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IESC and IRTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IESC vs. IRTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IESC drawdown since its inception was -98.32%, which is greater than IRTC's maximum drawdown of -84.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IESC and IRTC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IESCIRTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.32%

-84.39%

-13.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.80%

-44.75%

+22.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.23%

-53.83%

+4.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.22%

-66.03%

+11.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-57.67%

+57.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.97%

-37.10%

-17.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.66%

22.10%

-14.44%

Volatility

IESC vs. IRTC - Volatility Comparison

IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) has a higher volatility of 15.69% compared to iRhythm Technologies, Inc. (IRTC) at 11.53%. This indicates that IESC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IRTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IESCIRTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.69%

11.53%

+4.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.65%

32.11%

+18.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.74%

42.84%

+19.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.09%

63.42%

-9.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.19%

61.72%

-13.53%

Dividends

IESC vs. IRTC - Dividend Comparison

Neither IESC nor IRTC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

IESC vs. IRTC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between IES Holdings, Inc. and iRhythm Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B20222023202420252026
974.20M
199.39M
(IESC) Total Revenue
(IRTC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

IESC vs. IRTC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between IES Holdings, Inc. and iRhythm Technologies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
24.5%
70.9%
Portfolio components
IESC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 238.70M and revenue of 974.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.5%.

IRTC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, iRhythm Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 141.35M and revenue of 199.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.9%.

IESC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 112.30M and revenue of 974.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

IRTC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, iRhythm Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of -16.19M and revenue of 199.39M, resulting in an operating margin of -8.1%.

IESC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 110.00M and revenue of 974.20M, resulting in a net margin of 11.3%.

IRTC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, iRhythm Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of -13.93M and revenue of 199.39M, resulting in a net margin of -7.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


IESC and IRTC have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IESC has higher volatility (15.69%) compared to IRTC (11.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IESC dropped -98.32% vs IRTC's -84.39%.

IESC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IESC and IRTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer