PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IRTC vs. FIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IRTC vs. FIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iRhythm Technologies, Inc. (IRTC) and Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IRTC achieves a -40.54% return, which is significantly lower than FIX's 101.97% return.


IRTC

1D
-3.36%
1M
-12.67%
YTD
-40.54%
6M
-41.99%
1Y
-24.99%
3Y*
-0.05%
5Y*
11.29%
10Y*

FIX

1D
5.33%
1M
0.91%
YTD
101.97%
6M
101.43%
1Y
295.63%
3Y*
130.76%
5Y*
86.55%
10Y*
51.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IRTC vs. FIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IRTC
iRhythm Technologies, Inc.
-40.54%96.78%-15.76%14.27%-20.41%-50.39%248.38%-2.00%23.96%86.83%
FIX
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
101.97%120.86%106.89%79.62%16.98%88.98%6.73%15.07%0.73%32.13%

Correlation

The correlation between IRTC and FIX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2016

0.25

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IRTC:

$3.43B

FIX:

$66.39B

EPS

IRTC:

-$0.85

FIX:

$34.64

PS Ratio

IRTC:

4.35

FIX:

6.56

PB Ratio

IRTC:

21.27

FIX:

23.58

Total Revenue (TTM)

IRTC:

$787.85M

FIX:

$10.14B

Gross Profit (TTM)

IRTC:

$559.39M

FIX:

$2.55B

EBITDA (TTM)

IRTC:

-$3.10M

FIX:

$1.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IRTC vs. FIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRTC
IRTC Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
IRTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRTC Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
IRTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRTC Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

FIX
FIX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IRTC vs. FIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iRhythm Technologies, Inc. (IRTC) and Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IRTCFIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.59

5.60

-6.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.69

5.23

-5.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.71

-0.78

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.56

21.40

-21.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.20

68.16

-69.36

IRTC vs. FIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IRTC Sharpe Ratio is -0.59, which is lower than the FIX Sharpe Ratio of 5.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IRTC and FIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IRTCFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.59

5.60

-6.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

1.96

-1.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.40

-0.15

Drawdowns

IRTC vs. FIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRTC drawdown since its inception was -84.39%, smaller than the maximum FIX drawdown of -93.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRTC and FIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IRTCFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.39%

-93.36%

+8.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.25%

-13.77%

-30.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.83%

-46.05%

-7.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.03%

-46.05%

-19.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-60.70%

-7.75%

-52.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.04%

-38.10%

+1.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.80%

4.32%

+16.48%

Volatility

IRTC vs. FIX - Volatility Comparison

iRhythm Technologies, Inc. (IRTC) and Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX) have volatilities of 12.23% and 12.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IRTCFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.23%

12.85%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.50%

37.41%

-5.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.42%

53.20%

-10.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.40%

44.44%

+18.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.79%

42.33%

+19.46%

Dividends

IRTC vs. FIX - Dividend Comparison

IRTC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIX
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
0.14%0.21%0.28%0.41%0.49%0.49%0.81%0.79%0.76%0.68%0.83%0.88%
IRTC
iRhythm Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

IRTC vs. FIX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between iRhythm Technologies, Inc. and Comfort Systems USA, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
199.39M
2.87B
(IRTC) Total Revenue
(FIX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

IRTC vs. FIX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between iRhythm Technologies, Inc. and Comfort Systems USA, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
70.9%
26.3%
Portfolio components
IRTC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, iRhythm Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 141.35M and revenue of 199.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.9%.

FIX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. reported a gross profit of 754.41M and revenue of 2.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.3%.

IRTC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, iRhythm Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of -16.19M and revenue of 199.39M, resulting in an operating margin of -8.1%.

FIX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. reported an operating income of 485.72M and revenue of 2.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.0%.

IRTC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, iRhythm Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of -13.93M and revenue of 199.39M, resulting in a net margin of -7.0%.

FIX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. reported a net income of 370.38M and revenue of 2.87B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


IRTC and FIX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIX has higher volatility (12.85%) compared to IRTC (12.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRTC dropped -84.39% vs FIX's -93.36%.

FIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.60 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IRTC and FIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer