PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEMG vs. VXF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEMG vs. VXF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEMG achieves a 26.58% return, which is significantly higher than VXF's 15.76% return. Over the past 10 years, IEMG has underperformed VXF with an annualized return of 10.66%, while VXF has yielded a comparatively higher 12.46% annualized return.


IEMG

1D
3.05%
1M
7.04%
YTD
26.58%
6M
29.75%
1Y
49.25%
3Y*
22.05%
5Y*
8.16%
10Y*
10.66%

VXF

1D
1.22%
1M
7.44%
YTD
15.76%
6M
14.58%
1Y
31.73%
3Y*
19.15%
5Y*
6.61%
10Y*
12.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEMG vs. VXF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
26.58%32.56%6.50%11.52%-19.98%-0.64%17.87%17.81%-14.92%37.38%
VXF
Vanguard Extended Market ETF
15.76%11.40%16.89%25.51%-26.52%12.31%32.45%27.96%-9.34%18.06%

Correlation

The correlation between IEMG and VXF is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2012

0.66

The correlation between IEMG and VXF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

IEMG vs. VXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IEMG
VXF

Technology

42.1%
19.8%

Financial Services

16.7%
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
9.7%

Industrials

8.0%
19.3%

Basic Materials

6.3%
4.2%

Communication Services

5.6%
3.3%

Energy

3.3%
5.1%

Healthcare

3.2%
13.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
2.7%

Utilities

1.9%
2.0%

Real Estate

1.6%
6.0%

Technology

IEMG
42.1%
VXF
19.8%

Financial Services

IEMG
16.7%
VXF
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

IEMG
8.5%
VXF
9.7%

Industrials

IEMG
8.0%
VXF
19.3%

Basic Materials

IEMG
6.3%
VXF
4.2%

Communication Services

IEMG
5.6%
VXF
3.3%

Energy

IEMG
3.3%
VXF
5.1%

Healthcare

IEMG
3.2%
VXF
13.3%

Consumer Defensive

IEMG
2.8%
VXF
2.7%

Utilities

IEMG
1.9%
VXF
2.0%

Real Estate

IEMG
1.6%
VXF
6.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEMG vs. VXF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEMG
IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

VXF
VXF Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXF Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
VXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXF Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEMG vs. VXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IEMGVXFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.31

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

3.12

+0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.77

10.99

+2.78

IEMG vs. VXF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEMG Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the VXF Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEMG and VXF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IEMG vs. VXF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEMG drawdown since its inception was -38.71%, smaller than the maximum VXF drawdown of -58.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMG and VXF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEMGVXFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.71%

-58.03%

+19.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.21%

-10.21%

-3.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.21%

-26.92%

+9.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.75%

-36.39%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.71%

-41.72%

+3.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

0.00%

-1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.95%

-9.54%

-3.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.59%

2.89%

+0.70%

Volatility

IEMG vs. VXF - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a higher volatility of 11.01% compared to Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF) at 6.59%. This indicates that IEMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEMGVXFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.01%

6.59%

+4.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.09%

13.30%

+5.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.25%

17.81%

+3.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.78%

22.43%

-3.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.19%

22.34%

-2.15%

IEMG vs. VXF - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEMG has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VXF's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IEMG vs. VXF - Dividend Comparison

IEMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, more than VXF's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
2.97%2.75%3.20%2.89%2.71%3.06%1.87%3.15%2.76%2.35%2.28%2.53%
VXF
Vanguard Extended Market ETF
1.00%1.14%1.09%1.27%1.15%1.13%1.07%1.30%1.66%1.25%1.43%1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


IEMG and VXF have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IEMG has higher volatility (11.01%) compared to VXF (6.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEMG dropped -38.71% vs VXF's -58.03%.

On 10-year performance, VXF leads with 12.46% vs 10.66% for IEMG. On fees, VXF is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VXF has been the lower-risk option at 6.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VXF has performed better with a 12.46% return vs 10.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VXF is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for IEMG.

IEMG has the higher dividend yield at 2.97%, compared with 1.00% for VXF.

IEMG is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while VXF is Mid Cap Blend Equities. IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net), while VXF tracks S&P Completion Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IEMG and 0.05% for VXF.

IEMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEMG and VXF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer