IEMG vs. SMLV
IEMG (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) and SMLV (SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IEMG is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net), while SMLV is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IEMG returned 8.77%/yr vs 10.42%/yr for SMLV. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IEMG charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for SMLV.
Performance
IEMG vs. SMLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IEMG achieves a 15.78% return, which is significantly lower than SMLV's 22.24% return. Over the past 10 years, IEMG has underperformed SMLV with an annualized return of 8.77%, while SMLV has yielded a comparatively higher 10.42% annualized return.
IEMG
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -9.83%
- 6M
- 9.74%
- YTD
- 15.78%
- 1Y
- 29.70%
- 3Y*
- 18.80%
- 5Y*
- 6.56%
- 10Y*
- 8.77%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.08%
SMLV
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 4.61%
- 6M
- 15.91%
- YTD
- 22.24%
- 1Y
- 28.48%
- 3Y*
- 17.10%
- 5Y*
- 10.21%
- 10Y*
- 10.42%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.06%
IEMG vs. SMLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 15.78% | 32.56% | 6.50% | 11.52% | -19.98% | -0.64% | 17.87% | 17.81% | -14.92% | 37.38% |
SMLV SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 22.24% | 5.66% | 16.77% | 7.52% | -7.69% | 27.67% | -1.55% | 24.10% | -6.62% | 5.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between IEMG and SMLV is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2013 | 0.50 |
The correlation between IEMG and SMLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IEMG vs. SMLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IEMG
SMLV
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
IEMG
SMLV
Financial Services
IEMG
SMLV
Consumer Cyclical
IEMG
SMLV
Industrials
IEMG
SMLV
Basic Materials
IEMG
SMLV
Communication Services
IEMG
SMLV
Healthcare
IEMG
SMLV
Energy
IEMG
SMLV
Consumer Defensive
IEMG
SMLV
Utilities
IEMG
SMLV
Real Estate
IEMG
SMLV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IEMG vs. SMLV — Risk / Return Rank
IEMG
SMLV
IEMG vs. SMLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IEMG | SMLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.34 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 3.90 | -1.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.35 | 10.99 | -3.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IEMG vs. SMLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEMG drawdown since its inception was -38.71%, smaller than the maximum SMLV drawdown of -42.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMG and SMLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEMG | SMLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.71% | -42.45% | +3.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.21% | -7.34% | -5.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.21% | -20.40% | +3.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.61% | -20.40% | -13.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.71% | -42.45% | +3.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.22% | -1.59% | -8.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.90% | -5.41% | -7.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.05% | 2.60% | +1.45% |
Volatility
IEMG vs. SMLV - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a higher volatility of 9.61% compared to SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) at 3.75%. This indicates that IEMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IEMG | SMLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.61% | 3.75% | +5.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.09% | 10.09% | +11.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.06% | 15.46% | +7.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.17% | 18.23% | +0.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.24% | 20.91% | -0.67% |
IEMG vs. SMLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEMG has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SMLV's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IEMG vs. SMLV - Dividend Comparison
IEMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, more than SMLV's 2.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 2.33% | 2.75% | 3.20% | 2.89% | 2.71% | 3.06% | 1.87% | 3.15% | 2.76% | 2.35% | 2.28% | 2.53% |
SMLV SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 2.23% | 2.74% | 2.68% | 2.68% | 2.40% | 2.12% | 2.47% | 2.62% | 3.15% | 7.92% | 3.04% | 2.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IEMG and SMLV have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IEMG has higher volatility (9.61%) compared to SMLV (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEMG dropped -38.71% vs SMLV's -42.45%.
On 10-year performance, SMLV leads with 10.42% vs 8.77% for IEMG. On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SMLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMLV has performed better with a 10.42% return vs 8.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for SMLV.
IEMG has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 2.23% for SMLV.
IEMG is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while SMLV is Volatility Hedged Equity. IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net), while SMLV tracks SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IEMG and 0.12% for SMLV.
SMLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IEMG and SMLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer