PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEFA vs. USRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEFA vs. USRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) and iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEFA achieves a 12.10% return, which is significantly lower than USRT's 20.34% return. Over the past 10 years, IEFA has outperformed USRT with an annualized return of 9.52%, while USRT has yielded a comparatively lower 6.14% annualized return.


IEFA

1D
0.43%
1M
1.41%
6M
6.08%
YTD
12.10%
1Y
25.11%
3Y*
17.33%
5Y*
8.81%
10Y*
9.52%
ALL TIME*
8.55%

USRT

1D
0.06%
1M
0.70%
6M
17.86%
YTD
20.34%
1Y
25.37%
3Y*
13.00%
5Y*
5.39%
10Y*
6.14%
ALL TIME*
5.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$866.09M$876.15M$940.56M
$32.34M$32.36M$34.42M

IEFA vs. USRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
12.10%32.08%3.26%17.95%-15.24%11.63%8.18%22.64%-14.14%26.57%
USRT
iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF
20.34%2.44%8.58%13.64%-24.43%43.26%-8.06%25.98%-4.67%5.27%

Correlation

The correlation between IEFA and USRT is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2012

0.50

The correlation between IEFA and USRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEFA vs. USRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IEFA
IEFA Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IEFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEFA Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
IEFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEFA Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

USRT
USRT Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
USRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
USRT Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
USRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
USRT Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IEFA vs. USRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) and iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IEFAUSRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.32

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

3.17

-0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.42

10.68

-2.26

IEFA vs. USRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEFA Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the USRT Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEFA and USRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IEFA vs. USRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEFA drawdown since its inception was -34.78%, smaller than the maximum USRT drawdown of -69.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEFA and USRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEFAUSRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.78%

-69.92%

+35.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.50%

-8.04%

-3.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.76%

-18.70%

+4.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.41%

-31.03%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.78%

-44.38%

+9.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-2.71%

+2.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.63%

-12.87%

+6.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

2.38%

+0.61%

Volatility

IEFA vs. USRT - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) and iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) have volatilities of 4.60% and 4.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEFAUSRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.60%

4.47%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.60%

10.64%

+2.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.68%

13.77%

+1.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.64%

18.94%

-2.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.04%

21.34%

-4.30%

IEFA vs. USRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEFA has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than USRT's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IEFA vs. USRT - Dividend Comparison

IEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, more than USRT's 2.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
3.33%3.55%3.47%3.20%2.70%3.32%1.90%3.18%3.46%2.57%2.96%2.63%
USRT
iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF
2.51%3.07%2.85%3.18%3.46%2.27%3.12%3.34%5.66%3.44%3.98%3.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


IEFA and USRT have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IEFA has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to USRT (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEFA dropped -34.78% vs USRT's -69.92%.

On 10-year performance, IEFA leads with 9.52% vs 6.14% for USRT. On fees, IEFA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, USRT has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IEFA has performed better with a 9.52% return vs 6.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IEFA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for USRT.

IEFA has the higher dividend yield at 3.33%, compared with 2.51% for USRT.

IEFA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while USRT is REIT. IEFA tracks MSCI EAFE IMI Index (Net), while USRT tracks FTSE Nareit Equity REITS 40 Act Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IEFA and 0.08% for USRT.

USRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEFA and USRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer