IEFA vs. IVLU
IEFA (iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF) and IVLU (iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds from iShares - IEFA tracks the MSCI EAFE IMI Index (Net) while IVLU tracks the MSCI World ex USA Enhanced Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IEFA returned 9.96%/yr vs 11.56%/yr for IVLU. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IEFA charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for IVLU.
Performance
IEFA vs. IVLU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IEFA achieves a 8.47% return, which is significantly lower than IVLU's 11.28% return. Over the past 10 years, IEFA has underperformed IVLU with an annualized return of 9.96%, while IVLU has yielded a comparatively higher 11.56% annualized return.
IEFA
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- 8.47%
- 6M
- 8.11%
- 1Y
- 22.09%
- 3Y*
- 16.84%
- 5Y*
- 8.24%
- 10Y*
- 9.96%
IVLU
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 11.28%
- 6M
- 10.90%
- 1Y
- 34.48%
- 3Y*
- 23.64%
- 5Y*
- 14.30%
- 10Y*
- 11.56%
IEFA vs. IVLU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | 8.47% | 32.08% | 3.26% | 17.95% | -15.24% | 11.63% | 8.18% | 22.64% | -14.14% | 26.57% |
IVLU iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF | 11.28% | 46.09% | 6.76% | 20.07% | -5.73% | 15.60% | -4.50% | 15.60% | -15.10% | 23.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between IEFA and IVLU is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2015 | 0.89 |
The correlation between IEFA and IVLU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
IEFA vs. IVLU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IEFA
IVLU
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
IEFA
IVLU
Industrials
IEFA
IVLU
Technology
IEFA
IVLU
Healthcare
IEFA
IVLU
Consumer Cyclical
IEFA
IVLU
Basic Materials
IEFA
IVLU
Consumer Defensive
IEFA
IVLU
Communication Services
IEFA
IVLU
Energy
IEFA
IVLU
Utilities
IEFA
IVLU
Real Estate
IEFA
IVLU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IEFA vs. IVLU — Risk / Return Rank
IEFA
IVLU
IEFA vs. IVLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) and iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF (IVLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IEFA | IVLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.40 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 2.96 | -1.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.34 | 11.24 | -3.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IEFA vs. IVLU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEFA drawdown since its inception was -34.78%, smaller than the maximum IVLU drawdown of -41.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEFA and IVLU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEFA | IVLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.78% | -41.85% | +7.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.50% | -11.69% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.76% | -15.48% | +1.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.41% | -26.04% | -4.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.78% | -41.85% | +7.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.97% | -2.23% | +0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.67% | -8.56% | +1.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 3.08% | -0.06% |
Volatility
IEFA vs. IVLU - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) and iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF (IVLU) have volatilities of 5.26% and 5.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IEFA | IVLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 5.27% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.22% | 12.94% | +0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.55% | 15.65% | -0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.61% | 16.54% | +0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.07% | 17.44% | -0.37% |
IEFA vs. IVLU - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEFA has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IVLU's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
IEFA vs. IVLU - Dividend Comparison
IEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, more than IVLU's 3.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | 3.44% | 3.55% | 3.47% | 3.20% | 2.70% | 3.32% | 1.90% | 3.18% | 3.46% | 2.57% | 2.96% | 2.63% |
IVLU iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF | 3.38% | 3.71% | 4.46% | 4.69% | 3.59% | 3.47% | 2.05% | 3.53% | 2.82% | 2.87% | 2.53% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, IEFA and IVLU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IVLU has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to IEFA (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEFA dropped -34.78% vs IVLU's -41.85%.
On 10-year performance, IVLU leads with 11.56% vs 9.96% for IEFA. On fees, IEFA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVLU has performed better with a 11.56% return vs 9.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IEFA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IVLU.
IEFA has the higher dividend yield at 3.44%, compared with 3.38% for IVLU.
IEFA tracks MSCI EAFE IMI Index (Net), while IVLU tracks MSCI World ex USA Enhanced Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IEFA and 0.30% for IVLU.
IVLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IEFA and IVLU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer