PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IEFA vs. IVLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IEFA vs. IVLU

Last updated Aug 4, 2026
Documentation

IEFA (iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF) and IVLU (iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds from iShares - IEFA tracks the MSCI EAFE IMI Index (Net) while IVLU tracks the MSCI World ex USA Enhanced Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IEFA returned 9.52%/yr vs 11.37%/yr for IVLU. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. IEFA charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for IVLU.

Performance

IEFA vs. IVLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) and iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF (IVLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEFA achieves a 12.10% return, which is significantly lower than IVLU's 16.70% return. Over the past 10 years, IEFA has underperformed IVLU with an annualized return of 9.52%, while IVLU has yielded a comparatively higher 11.37% annualized return.

IEFA

1D
0.43%
1M
1.41%
6M
6.08%
YTD
12.10%
1Y
25.11%
3Y*
17.33%
5Y*
8.81%
10Y*
9.52%
ALL TIME*
8.55%

IVLU

1D
0.32%
1M
3.19%
6M
8.70%
YTD
16.70%
1Y
37.44%
3Y*
24.12%
5Y*
15.65%
10Y*
11.37%
ALL TIME*
8.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

IEFA

iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
$866.09M$876.15M$940.56M

IVLU

iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF
$36.81M$33.42M$39.54M

IEFA vs. IVLU - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF		12.10%32.08%3.26%17.95%-15.24%11.63%8.18%22.64%-14.14%26.57%
IVLU
iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF		16.70%46.09%6.76%20.07%-5.73%15.60%-4.50%15.60%-15.10%23.10%

Correlation

The correlation between IEFA and IVLU is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2015

0.89

The correlation between IEFA and IVLU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

IEFA vs. IVLU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IEFA
IVLU

Financial Services

23.1%
29.4%

Industrials

19.7%
17.2%

Technology

12.6%
8.8%

Healthcare

9.8%
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

6.5%
6.0%

Basic Materials

6.3%
7.2%

Communication Services

4.3%
3.4%

Utilities

3.5%
3.6%

Energy

3.3%
5.6%

Real Estate

2.8%
1.4%

Financial Services

IEFA
23.1%
IVLU
29.4%

Industrials

IEFA
19.7%
IVLU
17.2%

Technology

IEFA
12.6%
IVLU
8.8%

Healthcare

IEFA
9.8%
IVLU
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IEFA
8.1%
IVLU
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

IEFA
6.5%
IVLU
6.0%

Basic Materials

IEFA
6.3%
IVLU
7.2%

Communication Services

IEFA
4.3%
IVLU
3.4%

Utilities

IEFA
3.5%
IVLU
3.6%

Energy

IEFA
3.3%
IVLU
5.6%

Real Estate

IEFA
2.8%
IVLU
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF

iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF

Often compared with IEFA:
IEFA vs. VEAIEFA vs. VXUSIEFA vs. EFAIEFA vs. FSPSXIEFA vs. IEMGIEFA vs. XEF.TOIEFA vs. IXUS
Often compared with IVLU:
IVLU vs. DFIVIVLU vs. FIVAIVLU vs. VXUSIVLU vs. IDMOIVLU vs. DISVIVLU vs. SFNNXIVLU vs. INTF

Return for Risk

IEFA vs. IVLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
IEFA
IEFA Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IEFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEFA Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
IEFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEFA Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
IVLU
IVLU Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
IVLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVLU Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
IVLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVLU Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IEFA vs. IVLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) and iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF (IVLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

IEFAIVLUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.61
2.41

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.30
3.27

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.43

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

3.22

-1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.42

12.31

-3.89

IEFA vs. IVLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEFA Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the IVLU Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEFA and IVLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IEFA vs. IVLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEFA drawdown since its inception was -34.78%, smaller than the maximum IVLU drawdown of -41.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEFA and IVLU.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IEFAIVLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.78%

-41.85%

+7.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.50%

-11.69%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.76%

-15.48%

+1.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.41%

-26.04%

-4.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.78%

-41.85%

+7.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-0.23%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.63%

-8.48%

+1.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

3.05%

-0.06%

Volatility

IEFA vs. IVLU - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) and iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF (IVLU) have volatilities of 4.60% and 4.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IEFAIVLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.60%

4.80%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.60%

13.35%

+0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.68%

15.64%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.64%

16.53%

+0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.04%

17.39%

-0.35%

IEFA vs. IVLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEFA has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IVLU's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

IEFA vs. IVLU - Dividend Comparison

IEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, more than IVLU's 3.22% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF		3.33%3.55%3.47%3.20%2.70%3.32%1.90%3.18%3.46%2.57%2.96%2.63%
IVLU
iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF		3.22%3.71%4.46%4.69%3.59%3.47%2.05%3.53%2.82%2.87%2.53%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.94, IEFA and IVLU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IVLU has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to IEFA (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEFA dropped -34.78% vs IVLU's -41.85%.

On 10-year performance, IVLU leads with 11.37% vs 9.52% for IEFA. On fees, IEFA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IEFA has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVLU has performed better with a 11.37% return vs 9.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IEFA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IVLU.

IEFA has the higher dividend yield at 3.33%, compared with 3.22% for IVLU.

IEFA tracks MSCI EAFE IMI Index (Net), while IVLU tracks MSCI World ex USA Enhanced Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IEFA and 0.30% for IVLU.

IVLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEFA and IVLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer