PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVLU vs. INTF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVLU vs. INTF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF (IVLU) and iShares International Equity Factor ETF (INTF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVLU achieves a 16.33% return, which is significantly higher than INTF's 13.08% return. Over the past 10 years, IVLU has outperformed INTF with an annualized return of 11.54%, while INTF has yielded a comparatively lower 9.60% annualized return.


IVLU

1D
-0.55%
1M
2.86%
6M
9.29%
YTD
16.33%
1Y
37.00%
3Y*
23.41%
5Y*
15.79%
10Y*
11.54%
ALL TIME*
8.77%

INTF

1D
-0.73%
1M
1.72%
6M
7.55%
YTD
13.08%
1Y
28.24%
3Y*
19.17%
5Y*
10.63%
10Y*
9.60%
ALL TIME*
7.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$7.21M$9.62M$11.81M
$37.29M$34.10M$39.51M

IVLU vs. INTF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVLU
iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF
16.33%46.09%6.76%20.07%-5.73%15.60%-4.50%15.60%-15.10%23.10%
INTF
iShares International Equity Factor ETF
13.08%35.50%5.99%18.25%-12.31%11.70%2.83%18.46%-15.87%28.46%

Correlation

The correlation between IVLU and INTF is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2015

0.88

The correlation between IVLU and INTF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVLU vs. INTF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVLU
INTF

Financial Services

29.4%
28.3%

Industrials

17.2%
18.5%

Healthcare

9.8%
8.6%

Technology

8.8%
9.6%

Basic Materials

7.2%
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

6.0%
5.6%

Energy

5.6%
5.7%

Utilities

3.6%
3.8%

Communication Services

3.4%
2.9%

Real Estate

1.4%
2.2%

Financial Services

IVLU
29.4%
INTF
28.3%

Industrials

IVLU
17.2%
INTF
18.5%

Healthcare

IVLU
9.8%
INTF
8.6%

Technology

IVLU
8.8%
INTF
9.6%

Basic Materials

IVLU
7.2%
INTF
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

IVLU
7.1%
INTF
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

IVLU
6.0%
INTF
5.6%

Energy

IVLU
5.6%
INTF
5.7%

Utilities

IVLU
3.6%
INTF
3.8%

Communication Services

IVLU
3.4%
INTF
2.9%

Real Estate

IVLU
1.4%
INTF
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVLU vs. INTF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IVLU
IVLU Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
IVLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVLU Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
IVLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVLU Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

INTF
INTF Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
INTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTF Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
INTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTF Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IVLU vs. INTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF (IVLU) and iShares International Equity Factor ETF (INTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IVLUINTFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.33

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

2.76

+0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.11

11.08

+1.03

IVLU vs. INTF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVLU Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the INTF Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVLU and INTF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IVLU vs. INTF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVLU drawdown since its inception was -41.85%, roughly equal to the maximum INTF drawdown of -40.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVLU and INTF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVLUINTFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.85%

-40.39%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.69%

-10.20%

-1.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.48%

-13.64%

-1.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-29.26%

+3.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.85%

-40.39%

-1.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-0.73%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.49%

-7.60%

-0.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

2.54%

+0.51%

Volatility

IVLU vs. INTF - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF (IVLU) has a higher volatility of 4.95% compared to iShares International Equity Factor ETF (INTF) at 4.38%. This indicates that IVLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVLUINTFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.95%

4.38%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.38%

12.88%

+0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.63%

15.05%

+0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.53%

16.22%

+0.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.40%

17.01%

+0.39%

IVLU vs. INTF - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVLU has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than INTF's 0.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVLU vs. INTF - Dividend Comparison

IVLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, more than INTF's 2.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INTF
iShares International Equity Factor ETF
2.96%2.87%3.53%3.59%2.81%5.38%2.06%3.65%2.62%3.26%1.66%0.85%
IVLU
iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF
3.23%3.71%4.46%4.69%3.59%3.47%2.05%3.53%2.82%2.87%2.53%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, IVLU and INTF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IVLU has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to INTF (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVLU dropped -41.85% vs INTF's -40.39%.

On 10-year performance, IVLU leads with 11.54% vs 9.60% for INTF. On fees, INTF is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, INTF has been the lower-risk option at 4.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVLU has performed better with a 11.54% return vs 9.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

INTF is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IVLU.

IVLU has the higher dividend yield at 3.23%, compared with 2.96% for INTF.

IVLU tracks MSCI World ex USA Enhanced Value Index, while INTF tracks STOXX International Equity Factor Index (USD) (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IVLU and 0.16% for INTF.

IVLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVLU and INTF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer