PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVLU vs. INTF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVLU vs. INTF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF (IVLU) and iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVLU achieves a 11.28% return, which is significantly higher than INTF's 9.41% return. Over the past 10 years, IVLU has outperformed INTF with an annualized return of 11.56%, while INTF has yielded a comparatively lower 9.89% annualized return.


IVLU

1D
-1.89%
1M
-0.75%
YTD
11.28%
6M
10.90%
1Y
34.48%
3Y*
23.64%
5Y*
14.30%
10Y*
11.56%

INTF

1D
-1.70%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
9.41%
6M
9.06%
1Y
26.10%
3Y*
19.63%
5Y*
9.83%
10Y*
9.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVLU vs. INTF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVLU
iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF
11.28%46.09%6.76%20.07%-5.73%15.60%-4.50%15.60%-15.10%23.10%
INTF
iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF
9.41%35.50%5.99%18.25%-12.31%11.70%2.83%18.46%-15.87%28.46%

Correlation

The correlation between IVLU and INTF is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2015

0.88

The correlation between IVLU and INTF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVLU vs. INTF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVLU
INTF

Financial Services

26.5%
26.5%

Industrials

18.8%
19.0%

Technology

10.6%
9.9%

Healthcare

9.0%
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%
8.5%

Basic Materials

7.4%
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.0%
6.0%

Energy

5.5%
5.1%

Communication Services

3.7%
3.2%

Utilities

3.6%
3.9%

Real Estate

1.4%
2.5%

Financial Services

IVLU
26.5%
INTF
26.5%

Industrials

IVLU
18.8%
INTF
19.0%

Technology

IVLU
10.6%
INTF
9.9%

Healthcare

IVLU
9.0%
INTF
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IVLU
7.6%
INTF
8.5%

Basic Materials

IVLU
7.4%
INTF
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

IVLU
6.0%
INTF
6.0%

Energy

IVLU
5.5%
INTF
5.1%

Communication Services

IVLU
3.7%
INTF
3.2%

Utilities

IVLU
3.6%
INTF
3.9%

Real Estate

IVLU
1.4%
INTF
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVLU vs. INTF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVLU
IVLU Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
IVLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVLU Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IVLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVLU Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

INTF
INTF Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
INTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTF Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
INTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTF Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVLU vs. INTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF (IVLU) and iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IVLUINTFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.31

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

2.57

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.24

10.17

+1.07

IVLU vs. INTF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVLU Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the INTF Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVLU and INTF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IVLU vs. INTF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVLU drawdown since its inception was -41.85%, roughly equal to the maximum INTF drawdown of -40.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVLU and INTF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVLUINTFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.85%

-40.39%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.69%

-10.20%

-1.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.48%

-13.64%

-1.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-29.26%

+3.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.85%

-40.39%

-1.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.23%

-1.98%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.56%

-7.66%

-0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

2.57%

+0.51%

Volatility

IVLU vs. INTF - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF (IVLU) has a higher volatility of 5.27% compared to iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF) at 4.65%. This indicates that IVLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVLUINTFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.27%

4.65%

+0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.94%

12.58%

+0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.65%

14.98%

+0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.54%

16.22%

+0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.44%

17.12%

+0.32%

IVLU vs. INTF - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IVLU and INTF have an expense ratio of 0.30%.


Dividends

IVLU vs. INTF - Dividend Comparison

IVLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than INTF's 3.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INTF
iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF
3.06%2.87%3.53%3.59%2.81%5.38%2.06%3.65%2.62%3.26%1.66%0.85%
IVLU
iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF
3.38%3.71%4.46%4.69%3.59%3.47%2.05%3.53%2.82%2.87%2.53%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, IVLU and INTF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IVLU has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to INTF (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVLU dropped -41.85% vs INTF's -40.39%.

On 10-year performance, IVLU leads with 11.56% vs 9.89% for INTF. Both ETFs have the same 0.30% expense ratio. On volatility, INTF has been the lower-risk option at 4.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVLU has performed better with a 11.56% return vs 9.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVLU and INTF have the same expense ratio: 0.30% per year.

IVLU has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 3.06% for INTF.

IVLU tracks MSCI World ex USA Enhanced Value Index, while INTF tracks MSCI World ex USA Diversified Multi-Factor.

IVLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVLU and INTF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer