PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEFA vs. FDEGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEFA vs. FDEGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) and Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEFA achieves a 7.49% return, which is significantly lower than FDEGX's 8.51% return. Over the past 10 years, IEFA has underperformed FDEGX with an annualized return of 9.37%, while FDEGX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.86% annualized return.


IEFA

1D
0.63%
1M
-1.17%
YTD
7.49%
6M
10.04%
1Y
19.61%
3Y*
16.13%
5Y*
7.82%
10Y*
9.37%

FDEGX

1D
-3.58%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
8.51%
6M
-1.97%
1Y
1.60%
3Y*
16.17%
5Y*
7.93%
10Y*
11.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEFA vs. FDEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
7.49%32.08%3.26%17.95%-15.24%11.63%8.18%22.64%-14.14%26.57%
FDEGX
Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund
8.51%2.88%26.57%20.93%-26.50%21.30%29.34%36.59%-6.92%21.03%

Correlation

The correlation between IEFA and FDEGX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2012

0.72

The correlation between IEFA and FDEGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEFA vs. FDEGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEFA
IEFA Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
IEFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEFA Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
IEFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEFA Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

FDEGX
FDEGX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
FDEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
FDEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEFA vs. FDEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) and Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEFAFDEGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.04

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

0.15

+1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.52

0.37

+6.14

IEFA vs. FDEGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEFA Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is higher than the FDEGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEFA and FDEGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEFAFDEGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

0.13

+1.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.34

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.54

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.40

+0.11

Drawdowns

IEFA vs. FDEGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEFA drawdown since its inception was -34.78%, smaller than the maximum FDEGX drawdown of -85.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEFA and FDEGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEFAFDEGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.78%

-85.96%

+51.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.50%

-20.45%

+8.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.76%

-26.04%

+12.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.41%

-36.62%

+6.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.78%

-36.62%

+1.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.44%

-6.93%

+4.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.69%

-36.82%

+30.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

8.01%

-4.99%

Volatility

IEFA vs. FDEGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) is 4.54%, while Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX) has a volatility of 6.56%. This indicates that IEFA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEFAFDEGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.54%

6.56%

-2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.74%

19.21%

-6.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.22%

22.26%

-7.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.55%

23.35%

-6.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.32%

22.07%

-4.75%

IEFA vs. FDEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEFA has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FDEGX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

IEFA vs. FDEGX - Dividend Comparison

IEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, while FDEGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDEGX
Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund
0.00%0.00%7.89%0.05%0.00%14.15%8.37%3.65%0.75%0.05%0.59%0.13%
IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
3.30%3.55%3.47%3.20%2.70%3.32%1.90%3.18%3.46%2.57%2.96%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


IEFA and FDEGX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDEGX has higher volatility (6.56%) compared to IEFA (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEFA dropped -34.78% vs FDEGX's -85.96%.

IEFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEFA and FDEGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer