PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEFA vs. DXJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEFA vs. DXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEFA achieves a 10.11% return, which is significantly lower than DXJ's 23.23% return. Over the past 10 years, IEFA has underperformed DXJ with an annualized return of 9.48%, while DXJ has yielded a comparatively higher 18.71% annualized return.


IEFA

1D
1.41%
1M
-0.38%
6M
7.75%
YTD
10.11%
1Y
20.91%
3Y*
15.73%
5Y*
8.84%
10Y*
9.48%
ALL TIME*
8.43%

DXJ

1D
2.57%
1M
-0.48%
6M
16.68%
YTD
23.23%
1Y
55.39%
3Y*
31.84%
5Y*
27.58%
10Y*
18.71%
ALL TIME*
9.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEFA vs. DXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
10.11%32.08%3.26%17.95%-15.24%11.63%8.18%22.64%-14.14%26.57%
DXJ
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund
23.23%32.78%29.83%42.04%5.96%17.99%3.94%18.94%-19.78%22.81%

Correlation

The correlation between IEFA and DXJ is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2012

0.68

The correlation between IEFA and DXJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

IEFA vs. DXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IEFA
DXJ

Financial Services

24.2%
18.3%

Industrials

19.4%
27.9%

Technology

12.1%
13.2%

Healthcare

9.6%
6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.8%
15.2%

Basic Materials

6.5%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
4.7%

Communication Services

3.7%
2.3%

Energy

3.5%
1.7%

Utilities

3.5%
0.1%

Real Estate

2.7%

-

Financial Services

IEFA
24.2%
DXJ
18.3%

Industrials

IEFA
19.4%
DXJ
27.9%

Technology

IEFA
12.1%
DXJ
13.2%

Healthcare

IEFA
9.6%
DXJ
6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IEFA
7.8%
DXJ
15.2%

Basic Materials

IEFA
6.5%
DXJ
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

IEFA
6.4%
DXJ
4.7%

Communication Services

IEFA
3.7%
DXJ
2.3%

Energy

IEFA
3.5%
DXJ
1.7%

Utilities

IEFA
3.5%
DXJ
0.1%

Real Estate

IEFA
2.7%
DXJ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEFA vs. DXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEFA
IEFA Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
IEFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEFA Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
IEFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEFA Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

DXJ
DXJ Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
DXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
DXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEFA vs. DXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IEFADXJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.53

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

5.07

-3.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.90

19.07

-12.17

IEFA vs. DXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEFA Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the DXJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEFA and DXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IEFA vs. DXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEFA drawdown since its inception was -34.78%, smaller than the maximum DXJ drawdown of -49.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEFA and DXJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEFADXJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.78%

-49.63%

+14.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.50%

-10.98%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.76%

-22.19%

+8.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.41%

-22.19%

-8.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.78%

-39.14%

+4.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.41%

-1.82%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.64%

-14.26%

+7.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

2.91%

+0.13%

Volatility

IEFA vs. DXJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) is 4.22%, while WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) has a volatility of 6.87%. This indicates that IEFA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEFADXJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.22%

6.87%

-2.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.52%

14.64%

-1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.67%

18.55%

-2.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.59%

19.07%

-2.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.02%

19.94%

-2.92%

IEFA vs. DXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEFA has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than DXJ's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

IEFA vs. DXJ - Dividend Comparison

IEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, more than DXJ's 0.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DXJ
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund
0.95%1.29%3.48%3.44%3.02%2.64%2.53%2.47%2.92%2.30%1.98%5.95%
IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
3.39%3.55%3.47%3.20%2.70%3.32%1.90%3.18%3.46%2.57%2.96%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


IEFA and DXJ have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DXJ has higher volatility (6.87%) compared to IEFA (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEFA dropped -34.78% vs DXJ's -49.63%.

On 10-year performance, DXJ leads with 18.71% vs 9.48% for IEFA. On fees, IEFA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IEFA has been the lower-risk option at 4.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DXJ has performed better with a 18.71% return vs 9.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IEFA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for DXJ.

IEFA has the higher dividend yield at 3.39%, compared with 0.95% for DXJ.

IEFA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DXJ is Japan Equities. IEFA tracks MSCI EAFE IMI Index (Net), while DXJ tracks WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IEFA and 0.48% for DXJ.

DXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEFA and DXJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer