IEFA vs. DFIV
IEFA (iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF) and DFIV (Dimensional International Value ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. IEFA is passively managed, while DFIV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, IEFA returned 16.13%/yr vs 23.03%/yr for DFIV. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IEFA charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for DFIV.
Performance
IEFA vs. DFIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IEFA achieves a 7.49% return, which is significantly lower than DFIV's 10.17% return.
IEFA
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- 7.49%
- 6M
- 10.04%
- 1Y
- 19.61%
- 3Y*
- 16.13%
- 5Y*
- 7.82%
- 10Y*
- 9.37%
DFIV
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- YTD
- 10.17%
- 6M
- 14.07%
- 1Y
- 32.57%
- 3Y*
- 23.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IEFA vs. DFIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | 7.49% | 32.08% | 3.26% | 17.95% | -15.24% | -2.40% |
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF | 10.17% | 45.36% | 7.26% | 17.75% | -3.70% | 0.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between IEFA and DFIV is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2021 | 0.93 |
The correlation between IEFA and DFIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
IEFA vs. DFIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IEFA
DFIV
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
IEFA
DFIV
Industrials
IEFA
DFIV
Technology
IEFA
DFIV
Healthcare
IEFA
DFIV
Consumer Cyclical
IEFA
DFIV
Basic Materials
IEFA
DFIV
Consumer Defensive
IEFA
DFIV
Communication Services
IEFA
DFIV
Energy
IEFA
DFIV
Utilities
IEFA
DFIV
Real Estate
IEFA
DFIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IEFA vs. DFIV — Risk / Return Rank
IEFA
DFIV
IEFA vs. DFIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IEFA | DFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.42 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | 3.39 | -1.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.52 | 13.05 | -6.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IEFA | DFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 2.36 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.91 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
IEFA vs. DFIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEFA drawdown since its inception was -34.78%, which is greater than DFIV's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEFA and DFIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEFA | DFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.78% | -25.42% | -9.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.50% | -9.66% | -1.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.76% | -14.72% | +0.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.44% | -2.23% | -0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.69% | -4.47% | -2.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 2.50% | +0.52% |
Volatility
IEFA vs. DFIV - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) at 3.83%. This indicates that IEFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IEFA | DFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | 3.83% | +0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.74% | 11.26% | +1.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.22% | 13.91% | +1.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.55% | 16.65% | -0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.32% | 16.65% | +0.67% |
IEFA vs. DFIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEFA has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than DFIV's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IEFA vs. DFIV - Dividend Comparison
IEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, more than DFIV's 2.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF | 2.59% | 2.92% | 3.88% | 3.93% | 3.84% | 2.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | 3.30% | 3.55% | 3.47% | 3.20% | 2.70% | 3.32% | 1.90% | 3.18% | 3.46% | 2.57% | 2.96% | 2.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, IEFA and DFIV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IEFA has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to DFIV (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEFA dropped -34.78% vs DFIV's -25.42%.
On 3-year performance, DFIV leads with 23.03% vs 16.13% for IEFA. On fees, IEFA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, DFIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFIV has performed better with a 23.03% return vs 16.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IEFA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for DFIV.
IEFA has the higher dividend yield at 3.30%, compared with 2.59% for DFIV.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IEFA and 0.27% for DFIV.
DFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IEFA and DFIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer