PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDVO vs. EFAS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDVO vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDVO achieves a 14.12% return, which is significantly higher than EFAS's 12.96% return.


IDVO

1D
-1.25%
1M
2.08%
YTD
14.12%
6M
14.66%
1Y
35.28%
3Y*
23.82%
5Y*
10Y*

EFAS

1D
-0.58%
1M
-0.80%
YTD
12.96%
6M
17.29%
1Y
28.68%
3Y*
24.47%
5Y*
12.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDVO vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IDVO
Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
14.12%36.46%10.16%17.53%5.47%
EFAS
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF
12.96%46.83%3.07%14.65%10.24%

Correlation

The correlation between IDVO and EFAS is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2022

0.66

The correlation between IDVO and EFAS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

IDVO vs. EFAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDVO
EFAS

Financial Services

18.3%
30.1%

Basic Materials

15.7%
1.8%

Energy

12.1%
13.7%

Industrials

9.8%
9.9%

Communication Services

9.1%
8.6%

Technology

8.7%
0.1%

Healthcare

8.3%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.5%
8.1%

Utilities

6.4%
14.4%

Consumer Cyclical

4.2%
1.9%

Real Estate

-

11.3%

Financial Services

IDVO
18.3%
EFAS
30.1%

Basic Materials

IDVO
15.7%
EFAS
1.8%

Energy

IDVO
12.1%
EFAS
13.7%

Industrials

IDVO
9.8%
EFAS
9.9%

Communication Services

IDVO
9.1%
EFAS
8.6%

Technology

IDVO
8.7%
EFAS
0.1%

Healthcare

IDVO
8.3%
EFAS
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

IDVO
7.5%
EFAS
8.1%

Utilities

IDVO
6.4%
EFAS
14.4%

Consumer Cyclical

IDVO
4.2%
EFAS
1.9%

Real Estate

IDVO

-

EFAS
11.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDVO vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDVO
IDVO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IDVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDVO Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
IDVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDVO Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

EFAS
EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDVO vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDVOEFASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.47

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

5.44

-2.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.25

14.48

-1.24

IDVO vs. EFAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDVO Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the EFAS Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDVO and EFAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDVOEFASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

2.73

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.38

0.56

+0.82

Drawdowns

IDVO vs. EFAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDVO drawdown since its inception was -15.46%, smaller than the maximum EFAS drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDVO and EFAS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDVOEFASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.46%

-44.38%

+28.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.37%

-5.30%

-5.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.46%

-11.84%

-3.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

-3.01%

+1.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.30%

-7.08%

+4.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

1.99%

+0.68%

Volatility

IDVO vs. EFAS - Volatility Comparison

Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO) has a higher volatility of 5.20% compared to Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) at 2.96%. This indicates that IDVO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDVOEFASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.20%

2.96%

+2.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.05%

8.20%

+4.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.61%

10.60%

+5.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.36%

15.59%

+0.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.36%

18.33%

-1.97%

IDVO vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDVO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than EFAS's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDVO vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison

IDVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.48%, more than EFAS's 5.05% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EFAS
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF
5.05%4.83%6.76%6.33%7.28%5.19%4.34%5.75%6.63%6.15%0.21%
IDVO
Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
5.48%5.42%6.14%5.72%1.96%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDVO and EFAS have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDVO has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to EFAS (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDVO dropped -15.46% vs EFAS's -44.38%.

On 3-year performance, EFAS leads with 24.47% vs 23.82% for IDVO. On fees, EFAS is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, EFAS has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, EFAS has performed better with a 24.47% return vs 23.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EFAS is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IDVO.

IDVO has the higher dividend yield at 5.48%, compared with 5.05% for EFAS.

IDVO is categorized as Derivative Income, while EFAS is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IDVO and 0.56% for EFAS.

EFAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDVO and EFAS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer