IDV vs. SMH
IDV (iShares International Select Dividend ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDV is a Global Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IDV returned 10.92%/yr vs 37.49%/yr for SMH. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDV charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
IDV vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDV achieves a 13.60% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 72.15% return. Over the past 10 years, IDV has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 10.92%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.49% annualized return.
IDV
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- YTD
- 13.60%
- 6M
- 15.83%
- 1Y
- 35.03%
- 3Y*
- 25.11%
- 5Y*
- 12.17%
- 10Y*
- 10.92%
SMH
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- 8.30%
- YTD
- 72.15%
- 6M
- 75.62%
- 1Y
- 136.32%
- 3Y*
- 60.05%
- 5Y*
- 38.42%
- 10Y*
- 37.49%
IDV vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF | 13.60% | 52.16% | 4.00% | 10.32% | -6.40% | 12.00% | -5.94% | 23.56% | -10.37% | 19.74% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 72.15% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDV and SMH is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2007 | 0.57 |
The correlation between IDV and SMH shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (3 years) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IDV vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IDV
SMH
Financial Services
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
Healthcare
-
-
Financial Services
IDV
SMH
-
Energy
IDV
SMH
-
Utilities
IDV
SMH
-
Communication Services
IDV
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
IDV
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
IDV
SMH
-
Industrials
IDV
SMH
-
Basic Materials
IDV
SMH
-
Real Estate
IDV
SMH
-
Technology
IDV
SMH
Healthcare
IDV
-
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDV vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
IDV
SMH
IDV vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDV | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.60 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.13 | 9.18 | -5.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.32 | 33.74 | -18.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDV vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDV drawdown since its inception was -70.14%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDV and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDV | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.14% | -84.96% | +14.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.52% | -14.93% | +6.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.86% | -35.74% | +23.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.19% | -45.30% | +16.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.50% | -45.30% | +2.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.70% | -2.81% | +1.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.38% | -41.04% | +25.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.30% | 4.06% | -1.76% |
Volatility
IDV vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) is 4.24%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 16.25%. This indicates that IDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDV | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.24% | 16.25% | -12.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.88% | 27.73% | -16.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.10% | 33.20% | -20.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.58% | 35.47% | -19.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.92% | 32.82% | -14.90% |
IDV vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDV vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
IDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, more than SMH's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF | 4.40% | 4.94% | 6.46% | 6.51% | 7.33% | 5.78% | 5.47% | 5.15% | 5.93% | 4.52% | 4.69% | 5.08% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDV and SMH have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (16.25%) compared to IDV (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDV dropped -70.14% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 37.49% vs 10.92% for IDV. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 37.49% return vs 10.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for IDV.
IDV has the higher dividend yield at 4.40%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.
IDV is categorized as Global Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. IDV tracks Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for IDV and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs 2.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDV and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer