IDV vs. FGD
IDV (iShares International Select Dividend ETF) and FGD (First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund) are both Global Equities funds - IDV tracks the Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend while FGD tracks the Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IDV returned 10.28%/yr vs 9.79%/yr for FGD. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IDV charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FGD.
Performance
IDV vs. FGD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDV achieves a 12.32% return, which is significantly higher than FGD's 11.09% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IDV having a 10.28% annualized return and FGD not far behind at 9.79%.
IDV
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 12.32%
- 6M
- 15.21%
- 1Y
- 36.98%
- 3Y*
- 25.10%
- 5Y*
- 11.95%
- 10Y*
- 10.28%
FGD
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- 1.09%
- YTD
- 11.09%
- 6M
- 12.57%
- 1Y
- 33.36%
- 3Y*
- 22.45%
- 5Y*
- 10.37%
- 10Y*
- 9.79%
IDV vs. FGD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF | 12.32% | 52.16% | 4.00% | 10.32% | -6.40% | 12.00% | -5.94% | 23.56% | -10.37% | 19.74% |
FGD First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund | 11.09% | 44.42% | 5.71% | 8.20% | -7.25% | 20.83% | -5.23% | 20.64% | -12.49% | 17.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDV and FGD is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 28, 2007 | 0.86 |
The correlation between IDV and FGD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
IDV vs. FGD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IDV
FGD
Financial Services
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
Healthcare
-
-
Financial Services
IDV
FGD
Energy
IDV
FGD
Utilities
IDV
FGD
Communication Services
IDV
FGD
Consumer Cyclical
IDV
FGD
Consumer Defensive
IDV
FGD
Industrials
IDV
FGD
Basic Materials
IDV
FGD
Real Estate
IDV
FGD
Technology
IDV
FGD
Healthcare
IDV
-
FGD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDV vs. FGD — Risk / Return Rank
IDV
FGD
IDV vs. FGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) and First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IDV | FGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.48 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.36 | 3.41 | +0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.67 | 12.03 | +4.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IDV | FGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.90 | 2.67 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.70 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.54 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.26 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
IDV vs. FGD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDV drawdown since its inception was -70.14%, roughly equal to the maximum FGD drawdown of -68.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDV and FGD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDV | FGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.14% | -68.05% | -2.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.52% | -9.82% | +1.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.86% | -11.50% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.19% | -28.68% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.50% | -44.84% | +2.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.80% | -2.05% | -0.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.40% | -12.57% | -2.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 2.78% | -0.56% |
Volatility
IDV vs. FGD - Volatility Comparison
iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) has a higher volatility of 4.32% compared to First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) at 3.20%. This indicates that IDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDV | FGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.32% | 3.20% | +1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.60% | 9.73% | +0.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.85% | 12.56% | +0.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.54% | 14.92% | +0.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.94% | 18.23% | -0.29% |
IDV vs. FGD - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than FGD's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDV vs. FGD - Dividend Comparison
IDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, less than FGD's 5.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGD First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund | 5.09% | 5.62% | 5.87% | 6.44% | 5.74% | 5.35% | 6.17% | 5.19% | 5.88% | 4.01% | 4.36% | 5.07% |
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF | 4.45% | 4.94% | 6.46% | 6.51% | 7.33% | 5.78% | 5.47% | 5.15% | 5.93% | 4.52% | 4.69% | 5.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, IDV and FGD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IDV has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to FGD (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDV dropped -70.14% vs FGD's -68.05%.
On 10-year performance, IDV leads with 10.28% vs 9.79% for FGD. On fees, IDV is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, FGD has been the lower-risk option at 3.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IDV has performed better with a 10.28% return vs 9.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDV is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FGD.
FGD has the higher dividend yield at 5.09%, compared with 4.45% for IDV.
IDV tracks Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend, while FGD tracks Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for IDV and 0.59% for FGD.
IDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 2.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDV and FGD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer