PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDV vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDV vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDV achieves a 12.32% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 8.76% return. Over the past 10 years, IDV has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 10.28%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.30% annualized return.


IDV

1D
-1.09%
1M
0.90%
YTD
12.32%
6M
15.21%
1Y
36.98%
3Y*
25.10%
5Y*
11.95%
10Y*
10.28%

DGRO

1D
-0.28%
1M
3.14%
YTD
8.76%
6M
8.75%
1Y
22.54%
3Y*
16.99%
5Y*
10.54%
10Y*
13.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDV vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDV
iShares International Select Dividend ETF
12.32%52.16%4.00%10.32%-6.40%12.00%-5.94%23.56%-10.37%19.74%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
8.76%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between IDV and DGRO is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2014

0.70

The correlation between IDV and DGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (3 years) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IDV vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDV
DGRO

Financial Services

30.1%
21.2%

Energy

15.6%
5.6%

Utilities

11.8%
6.9%

Communication Services

10.0%
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

7.2%
11.5%

Industrials

6.7%
10.8%

Basic Materials

5.8%
2.5%

Real Estate

2.4%

-

Technology

0.9%
19.4%

Healthcare

-

16.4%

Financial Services

IDV
30.1%
DGRO
21.2%

Energy

IDV
15.6%
DGRO
5.6%

Utilities

IDV
11.8%
DGRO
6.9%

Communication Services

IDV
10.0%
DGRO
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

IDV
9.6%
DGRO
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

IDV
7.2%
DGRO
11.5%

Industrials

IDV
6.7%
DGRO
10.8%

Basic Materials

IDV
5.8%
DGRO
2.5%

Real Estate

IDV
2.4%
DGRO

-

Technology

IDV
0.9%
DGRO
19.4%

Healthcare

IDV

-

DGRO
16.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDV vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDV
IDV Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
IDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
IDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDV Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDV vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDVDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.43

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.36

3.50

+0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.67

13.52

+3.15

IDV vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.90, which is comparable to the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDV and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDVDGRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.90

2.39

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.77

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.80

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.76

-0.55

Drawdowns

IDV vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDV drawdown since its inception was -70.14%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDV and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDVDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.14%

-35.10%

-35.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.52%

-6.47%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.86%

-14.03%

+2.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.19%

-19.31%

-9.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.50%

-35.10%

-7.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.80%

-0.28%

-2.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.40%

-3.44%

-11.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

1.67%

+0.55%

Volatility

IDV vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) has a higher volatility of 4.32% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.21%. This indicates that IDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDVDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.32%

2.21%

+2.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.60%

6.91%

+3.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.85%

9.48%

+3.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.54%

13.82%

+1.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.94%

16.62%

+1.32%

IDV vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDV vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

IDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, more than DGRO's 1.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.96%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
IDV
iShares International Select Dividend ETF
4.45%4.94%6.46%6.51%7.33%5.78%5.47%5.15%5.93%4.52%4.69%5.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDV and DGRO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDV has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to DGRO (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDV dropped -70.14% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 10-year performance, DGRO leads with 13.30% vs 10.28% for IDV. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 13.30% return vs 10.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for IDV.

IDV has the higher dividend yield at 4.45%, compared with 1.96% for DGRO.

IDV is categorized as Global Equities, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. IDV tracks Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for IDV and 0.08% for DGRO.

IDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDV and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer