PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDUB vs. MSTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDUB vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus International Enhanced Yield ETF (IDUB) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDUB achieves a 16.06% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -26.97% return.


IDUB

1D
0.53%
1M
0.56%
6M
12.67%
YTD
16.06%
1Y
29.44%
3Y*
17.56%
5Y*
10Y*

MSTZ

1D
-1.53%
1M
39.32%
6M
-19.19%
YTD
-26.97%
1Y
264.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDUB vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IDUB
Aptus International Enhanced Yield ETF
16.06%27.53%-2.48%
MSTZ
T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF
-26.97%-38.95%-94.43%

Correlation

The correlation between IDUB and MSTZ is -0.36, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024

-0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDUB vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDUB
IDUB Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
IDUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDUB Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
IDUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDUB Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTZ
MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDUB vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus International Enhanced Yield ETF (IDUB) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDUBMSTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.30

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

2.86

-0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.61

5.59

+4.02

IDUB vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDUB Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDUB and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDUB vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDUB drawdown since its inception was -29.20%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDUB and MSTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDUBMSTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.20%

-99.38%

+70.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.46%

-84.89%

+73.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

-97.51%

+96.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.97%

-94.53%

+83.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

43.41%

-40.46%

Volatility

IDUB vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aptus International Enhanced Yield ETF (IDUB) is 5.36%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 56.46%. This indicates that IDUB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDUBMSTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.36%

56.46%

-51.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.25%

135.20%

-120.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.50%

148.41%

-131.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.78%

171.17%

-156.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.78%

171.17%

-156.39%

IDUB vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDUB has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDUB vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

IDUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
IDUB
Aptus International Enhanced Yield ETF
4.56%4.90%5.64%3.71%2.62%1.38%
MSTZ
T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDUB and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTZ has higher volatility (56.46%) compared to IDUB (5.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDUB dropped -29.20% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 264.10% vs 29.44% for IDUB. On fees, IDUB is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, IDUB has been the lower-risk option at 5.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 264.10% return vs 29.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDUB is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

IDUB has the higher dividend yield at 4.56%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

IDUB is categorized as Long-Short, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Aptus and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for IDUB and 1.05% for MSTZ.

IDUB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDUB and MSTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer