PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDUB vs. FTLS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDUB vs. FTLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus International Enhanced Yield ETF (IDUB) and First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDUB achieves a 15.21% return, which is significantly higher than FTLS's 6.03% return.


IDUB

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.00%
6M
9.16%
YTD
15.21%
1Y
30.13%
3Y*
16.22%
5Y*
6.15%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.13%

FTLS

1D
-0.31%
1M
1.47%
6M
4.95%
YTD
6.03%
1Y
14.40%
3Y*
13.13%
5Y*
10.06%
10Y*
9.59%
ALL TIME*
9.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.26M$8.04M$8.94M
$907.21K$1.03M$881.50K

IDUB vs. FTLS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IDUB
Aptus International Enhanced Yield ETF
15.21%27.53%6.12%9.07%-19.79%-1.16%
FTLS
First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF
6.03%9.09%18.80%16.94%-5.56%7.04%

Correlation

The correlation between IDUB and FTLS is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2021

0.59

The correlation between IDUB and FTLS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDUB vs. FTLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IDUB
IDUB Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
IDUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDUB Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
IDUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDUB Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

FTLS
FTLS Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FTLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTLS Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FTLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTLS Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IDUB vs. FTLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus International Enhanced Yield ETF (IDUB) and First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDUBFTLSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.28

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

3.55

-0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.99

10.80

-0.81

IDUB vs. FTLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDUB Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the FTLS Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDUB and FTLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDUB vs. FTLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDUB drawdown since its inception was -29.20%, which is greater than FTLS's maximum drawdown of -20.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDUB and FTLS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDUBFTLSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.20%

-20.54%

-8.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.46%

-3.79%

-7.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.88%

-11.69%

-1.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.20%

-11.69%

-17.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.95%

-0.42%

-1.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.88%

-2.67%

-8.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

1.24%

+1.74%

Volatility

IDUB vs. FTLS - Volatility Comparison

Aptus International Enhanced Yield ETF (IDUB) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS) at 2.15%. This indicates that IDUB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDUBFTLSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.84%

2.15%

+2.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.62%

5.86%

+8.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.52%

8.54%

+7.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.84%

10.53%

+4.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.82%

11.23%

+3.59%

IDUB vs. FTLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDUB has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FTLS's 1.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDUB vs. FTLS - Dividend Comparison

IDUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, more than FTLS's 0.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTLS
First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF
0.88%1.07%1.50%1.49%0.81%0.01%0.44%0.83%0.87%0.43%1.04%0.49%
IDUB
Aptus International Enhanced Yield ETF
4.59%4.90%5.64%3.71%2.62%1.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDUB and FTLS have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDUB has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to FTLS (2.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDUB dropped -29.20% vs FTLS's -20.54%.

On 5-year performance, FTLS leads with 10.06% vs 6.15% for IDUB. On fees, IDUB is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FTLS has been the lower-risk option at 2.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FTLS has performed better with a 10.06% return vs 6.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDUB is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.38% for FTLS.

IDUB has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 0.88% for FTLS.

They also come from different issuers: Aptus and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for IDUB and 1.38% for FTLS.

IDUB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDUB and FTLS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer