PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDU vs. UTF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDU vs. UTF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Utilities ETF (IDU) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDU achieves a 2.64% return, which is significantly lower than UTF's 14.60% return. Over the past 10 years, IDU has underperformed UTF with an annualized return of 8.72%, while UTF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.56% annualized return.


IDU

1D
-0.28%
1M
-5.52%
YTD
2.64%
6M
1.08%
1Y
6.88%
3Y*
13.73%
5Y*
9.04%
10Y*
8.72%

UTF

1D
-0.26%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
14.60%
6M
16.03%
1Y
11.33%
3Y*
16.30%
5Y*
6.39%
10Y*
11.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDU vs. UTF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDU
iShares U.S. Utilities ETF
2.64%15.23%23.23%-5.02%0.17%16.96%-1.07%24.21%3.93%11.94%
UTF
Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc
14.60%9.93%22.37%-3.83%-9.60%17.91%6.93%42.74%-9.87%34.10%

Correlation

The correlation between IDU and UTF is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2004

0.57

The correlation between IDU and UTF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDU vs. UTF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDU
IDU Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
IDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDU Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
IDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDU Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

UTF
UTF Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
UTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTF Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
UTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTF Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDU vs. UTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Utilities ETF (IDU) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDUUTFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.16

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.75

1.10

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.78

2.25

-0.47

IDU vs. UTF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDU Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the UTF Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDU and UTF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDUUTFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

0.92

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.35

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.50

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.45

-0.03

Drawdowns

IDU vs. UTF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDU drawdown since its inception was -53.88%, smaller than the maximum UTF drawdown of -72.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDU and UTF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDUUTFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.88%

-72.62%

+18.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.15%

-10.33%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.74%

-21.06%

+4.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.11%

-30.28%

+6.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.18%

-52.53%

+16.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.85%

-1.69%

-6.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.38%

-10.37%

-1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.88%

5.05%

-1.17%

Volatility

IDU vs. UTF - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Utilities ETF (IDU) has a higher volatility of 5.04% compared to Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) at 2.78%. This indicates that IDU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDUUTFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.04%

2.78%

+2.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.95%

8.39%

+2.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.79%

12.33%

+1.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.49%

18.33%

-1.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.72%

23.37%

-4.65%

Dividends

IDU vs. UTF - Dividend Comparison

IDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, less than UTF's 6.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDU
iShares U.S. Utilities ETF
2.24%2.23%2.29%2.79%2.39%2.39%2.94%2.71%2.80%2.62%3.18%4.22%
UTF
Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc
6.98%7.62%7.74%8.76%7.75%6.53%7.20%7.10%10.12%7.37%10.51%8.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDU and UTF have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDU has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to UTF (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDU dropped -53.88% vs UTF's -72.62%.

UTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDU and UTF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer