IDU vs. IHF

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

IDU (iShares U.S. Utilities ETF) and IHF (iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Utilities RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index, while IHF is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Healthcare Providers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IDU returned 8.55%/yr vs 9.49%/yr for IHF. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.38% expense ratio.

Performance

IDU vs. IHF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Utilities ETF (IDU) and iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDU achieves a 4.85% return, which is significantly lower than IHF's 18.08% return. Over the past 10 years, IDU has underperformed IHF with an annualized return of 8.55%, while IHF has yielded a comparatively higher 9.49% annualized return.

IDU

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: -2.90%
• 6M: 3.47%
• YTD: 4.85%
• 1Y: 5.16%
• 3Y*: 13.66%
• 5Y*: 9.24%
• 10Y*: 8.55%
• ALL TIME*: 7.89%

IHF

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: -1.95%
• 6M: 24.31%
• YTD: 18.08%
• 1Y: 39.67%
• 3Y*: 3.50%
• 5Y*: 1.81%
• 10Y*: 9.49%
• ALL TIME*: 9.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IDU iShares U.S. Utilities ETF	$20.80M	$13.25M	$15.74M
IHF iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF	$33.12M	$27.16M	$26.59M

IDU vs. IHF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IDU iShares U.S. Utilities ETF	4.85%	15.23%	23.23%	-5.02%	0.17%	16.96%	-1.07%	24.21%	3.93%	11.94%
IHF iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF	18.08%	0.92%	-7.90%	-1.11%	-7.11%	24.46%	17.67%	22.34%	9.56%	25.45%

Correlation

The correlation between IDU and IHF is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.29
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.39
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006	0.40

The correlation between IDU and IHF shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IDU vs. IHF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IDU	IHF
Utilities	90.5%	-
Industrials	9.1%	0.1%
Energy	0.4%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.3%
Healthcare	-	95.2%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	4.4%

Return for Risk

IDU vs. IHF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IDU

IDU Risk / Return Rank: 19
IDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
IDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
IDU Omega Ratio Rank: 18
IDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
IDU Martin Ratio Rank: 19

IHF

IHF Risk / Return Rank: 66
IHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
IHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
IHF Omega Ratio Rank: 81
IHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
IHF Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IDU vs. IHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Utilities ETF (IDU) and iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IDU	IHF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.37	1.81	-1.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.60	2.34	-1.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.34	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.57	1.88	-1.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.21	5.15	-3.94

IDU vs. IHF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDU Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the IHF Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDU and IHF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IDU vs. IHF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDU drawdown since its inception was -53.88%, smaller than the maximum IHF drawdown of -58.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDU and IHF.

Drawdown Indicators

	IDU	IHF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.88%	-58.42%	+4.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.15%	-19.72%	+10.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.35%	-29.85%	+17.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.11%	-29.85%	+5.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.18%	-35.23%	-0.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.87%	-2.98%	-2.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.34%	-10.59%	-0.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.29%	7.18%	-2.89%

Volatility

IDU vs. IHF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Utilities ETF (IDU) is 4.48%, while iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF) has a volatility of 4.88%. This indicates that IDU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IDU	IHF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.48%	4.88%	-0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.46%	12.93%	-1.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.23%	20.62%	-6.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.50%	19.29%	-2.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.76%	21.04%	-2.28%

IDU vs. IHF - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IDU and IHF have an expense ratio of 0.38%.

Dividends

IDU vs. IHF - Dividend Comparison

IDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, more than IHF's 0.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IDU iShares U.S. Utilities ETF	2.24%	2.23%	2.29%	2.79%	2.39%	2.39%	2.94%	2.71%	2.80%	2.62%	3.18%	4.22%
IHF iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF	0.93%	1.05%	0.86%	0.79%	0.74%	0.56%	0.53%	0.58%	4.01%	0.19%	0.25%	0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IDU and IHF in my portfolio?

IDU and IHF have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IDU or IHF?

IHF has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to IDU (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDU dropped -53.88% vs IHF's -58.42%.

Which ETF is better, IDU or IHF?

On 10-year performance, IHF leads with 9.49% vs 8.55% for IDU. Both ETFs have the same 0.38% expense ratio. On volatility, IDU has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IDU or IHF?

Over the 10-year period, IHF has performed better with a 9.49% return vs 8.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IDU or IHF?

IDU and IHF have the same expense ratio: 0.38% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IDU or IHF?

IDU has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 0.93% for IHF.

What is the main difference between IDU and IHF?

IDU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while IHF is Health & Biotech Equities. IDU tracks Russell 1000 Utilities RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index, while IHF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Healthcare Providers Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.