IDOG vs. RODM

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

IDOG (ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF) and RODM (Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - IDOG tracks the S-Network International Sector Dividend Dogs Index while RODM tracks the Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IDOG returned 11.30%/yr vs 9.39%/yr for RODM. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IDOG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for RODM.

Performance

IDOG vs. RODM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IDOG having a 10.49% return and RODM slightly higher at 10.94%. Over the past 10 years, IDOG has outperformed RODM with an annualized return of 11.30%, while RODM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.39% annualized return.

IDOG

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: -2.89%
• YTD: 10.49%
• 6M: 11.30%
• 1Y: 31.59%
• 3Y*: 20.32%
• 5Y*: 13.17%
• 10Y*: 11.30%

RODM

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -1.11%
• YTD: 10.94%
• 6M: 11.39%
• 1Y: 25.72%
• 3Y*: 20.45%
• 5Y*: 9.96%
• 10Y*: 9.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDOG vs. RODM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IDOG ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF	10.49%	39.94%	1.35%	23.57%	-4.50%	11.33%	-1.78%	21.93%	-13.47%	25.61%
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF	10.94%	34.42%	8.02%	15.76%	-14.54%	11.11%	-0.62%	17.15%	-9.97%	25.14%

Correlation

The correlation between IDOG and RODM is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2015	0.82

The correlation between IDOG and RODM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

IDOG vs. RODM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IDOG	RODM
Industrials	12.2%	16.7%
Financial Services	11.3%	26.6%
Basic Materials	10.2%	6.4%
Energy	10.1%	6.3%
Communication Services	9.8%	5.5%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	6.0%
Utilities	9.6%	4.8%
Consumer Defensive	9.1%	4.0%
Technology	9.1%	10.5%
Healthcare	8.9%	9.0%
Real Estate	-	3.5%

Return for Risk

IDOG vs. RODM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDOG

IDOG Risk / Return Rank: 77
IDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
IDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
IDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 68
IDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
IDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 84

RODM

RODM Risk / Return Rank: 77
RODM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
RODM Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
RODM Omega Ratio Rank: 76
RODM Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
RODM Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDOG vs. RODM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IDOG	RODM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.29	2.37	-0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.05	3.32	-0.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.43	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.90	3.64	+1.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.75	14.43	+2.32

IDOG vs. RODM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDOG Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the RODM Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDOG and RODM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IDOG vs. RODM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDOG drawdown since its inception was -37.32%, roughly equal to the maximum RODM drawdown of -35.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDOG and RODM.

Drawdown Indicators

	IDOG	RODM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.32%	-35.98%	-1.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.47%	-7.10%	+0.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.92%	-10.58%	-3.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.31%	-28.85%	+3.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.32%	-35.98%	-1.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.08%	-1.47%	-2.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.90%	-6.36%	-1.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.89%	1.79%	+0.10%

Volatility

IDOG vs. RODM - Volatility Comparison

ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG) has a higher volatility of 4.86% compared to Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) at 3.15%. This indicates that IDOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RODM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IDOG	RODM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.86%	3.15%	+1.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.94%	8.76%	+2.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.91%	10.94%	+2.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.69%	13.45%	+2.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.41%	15.19%	+2.22%

IDOG vs. RODM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDOG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than RODM's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

IDOG vs. RODM - Dividend Comparison

IDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, more than RODM's 2.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IDOG ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF	4.45%	4.26%	4.90%	4.86%	4.46%	3.85%	3.00%	5.41%	4.50%	3.33%	4.01%	4.19%
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF	2.80%	3.11%	4.09%	4.42%	3.81%	4.41%	2.82%	2.82%	2.03%	2.24%	3.19%	2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IDOG and RODM in my portfolio?

IDOG and RODM have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IDOG or RODM?

IDOG has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to RODM (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDOG dropped -37.32% vs RODM's -35.98%.

Which ETF is better, IDOG or RODM?

On 10-year performance, IDOG leads with 11.30% vs 9.39% for RODM. On fees, RODM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, RODM has been the lower-risk option at 3.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IDOG or RODM?

Over the 10-year period, IDOG has performed better with a 11.30% return vs 9.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IDOG or RODM?

RODM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IDOG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IDOG or RODM?

IDOG has the higher dividend yield at 4.45%, compared with 2.80% for RODM.

What is the main difference between IDOG and RODM?

IDOG tracks S-Network International Sector Dividend Dogs Index, while RODM tracks Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IDOG and 0.29% for RODM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RODM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.