PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDMO vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDMO vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDMO achieves a 7.74% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, IDMO has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 12.09%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.56% annualized return.


IDMO

1D
-1.16%
1M
2.20%
YTD
7.74%
6M
12.22%
1Y
23.09%
3Y*
25.70%
5Y*
15.53%
10Y*
12.09%

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDMO vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
7.74%42.17%12.79%20.16%-12.03%14.31%22.01%26.09%-16.66%29.21%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between IDMO and VOO is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2012

0.53

The correlation between IDMO and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (all time) to 0.73 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IDMO vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDMO
VOO

Financial Services

42.4%
11.6%

Industrials

22.6%
8.3%

Basic Materials

10.2%
1.8%

Utilities

8.4%
2.4%

Technology

5.3%
35.7%

Consumer Defensive

2.5%
4.9%

Communication Services

2.2%
11.3%

Real Estate

2.0%
1.9%

Energy

1.9%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

1.4%
10.2%

Healthcare

1.2%
8.5%

Financial Services

IDMO
42.4%
VOO
11.6%

Industrials

IDMO
22.6%
VOO
8.3%

Basic Materials

IDMO
10.2%
VOO
1.8%

Utilities

IDMO
8.4%
VOO
2.4%

Technology

IDMO
5.3%
VOO
35.7%

Consumer Defensive

IDMO
2.5%
VOO
4.9%

Communication Services

IDMO
2.2%
VOO
11.3%

Real Estate

IDMO
2.0%
VOO
1.9%

Energy

IDMO
1.9%
VOO
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IDMO
1.4%
VOO
10.2%

Healthcare

IDMO
1.2%
VOO
8.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDMO vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDMO
IDMO Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
IDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
IDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDMO vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDMOVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.43

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

3.16

-1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.84

14.73

-6.89

IDMO vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDMO and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDMOVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

2.39

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

0.83

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.87

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.89

-0.43

Drawdowns

IDMO vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDMO drawdown since its inception was -39.38%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDMO and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDMOVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.38%

-33.99%

-5.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

-8.90%

-3.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.65%

-18.69%

+6.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.07%

-24.52%

-2.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.34%

-33.99%

+2.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.31%

-0.70%

-1.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.76%

-3.69%

-6.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

1.91%

+1.04%

Volatility

IDMO vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) has a higher volatility of 6.43% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that IDMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDMOVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.43%

2.84%

+3.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.91%

8.90%

+6.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.89%

11.80%

+5.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.84%

16.81%

+1.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.12%

18.01%

+0.11%

IDMO vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDMO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IDMO vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

IDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
3.53%3.71%2.24%2.89%3.66%1.81%1.63%2.78%3.27%3.08%2.18%2.52%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDMO and VOO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDMO has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDMO dropped -39.38% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.56% vs 12.09% for IDMO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.56% return vs 12.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IDMO.

IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.53%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.

IDMO is categorized as Momentum, while VOO is S&P 500. IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IDMO and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDMO and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer