PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDMO vs. FEZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDMO vs. FEZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) and State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDMO achieves a 6.72% return, which is significantly higher than FEZ's 6.18% return. Over the past 10 years, IDMO has outperformed FEZ with an annualized return of 12.15%, while FEZ has yielded a comparatively lower 10.83% annualized return.


IDMO

1D
-0.78%
1M
-4.04%
6M
3.61%
YTD
6.72%
1Y
19.40%
3Y*
23.73%
5Y*
14.74%
10Y*
12.15%
ALL TIME*
8.80%

FEZ

1D
-0.80%
1M
-2.56%
6M
2.67%
YTD
6.18%
1Y
16.45%
3Y*
15.93%
5Y*
11.10%
10Y*
10.83%
ALL TIME*
7.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDMO vs. FEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
6.72%42.17%12.79%20.16%-12.03%14.31%22.01%26.09%-16.66%29.21%
FEZ
State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
6.18%37.81%3.57%27.16%-14.27%14.84%4.84%26.04%-15.85%24.80%

Correlation

The correlation between IDMO and FEZ is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2012

0.61

Over the past year, IDMO and FEZ have become more correlated (0.87) than their long-term average of 0.61, meaning their price movements have been converging.

IDMO vs. FEZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDMO
FEZ

Financial Services

12.1%
26.2%

Basic Materials

4.6%
3.5%

Industrials

1.0%
22.1%

Energy

0.6%
4.5%

Technology

0.5%
16.6%

Healthcare

0.5%
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

0.4%
5.6%

Real Estate

0.3%

-

Utilities

0.2%
4.9%

Communication Services

0.1%
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%
9.5%

Financial Services

IDMO
12.1%
FEZ
26.2%

Basic Materials

IDMO
4.6%
FEZ
3.5%

Industrials

IDMO
1.0%
FEZ
22.1%

Energy

IDMO
0.6%
FEZ
4.5%

Technology

IDMO
0.5%
FEZ
16.6%

Healthcare

IDMO
0.5%
FEZ
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

IDMO
0.4%
FEZ
5.6%

Real Estate

IDMO
0.3%
FEZ

-

Utilities

IDMO
0.2%
FEZ
4.9%

Communication Services

IDMO
0.1%
FEZ
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IDMO
0.0%
FEZ
9.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDMO vs. FEZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDMO
IDMO Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
IDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
IDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

FEZ
FEZ Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
FEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
FEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDMO vs. FEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) and State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDMOFEZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.16

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

1.21

+0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.15

4.15

+2.00

IDMO vs. FEZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is comparable to the FEZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDMO and FEZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDMO vs. FEZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDMO drawdown since its inception was -39.38%, smaller than the maximum FEZ drawdown of -64.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDMO and FEZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDMOFEZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.38%

-64.21%

+24.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

-13.63%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.65%

-15.85%

+3.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.07%

-35.05%

+7.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.34%

-39.69%

+8.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.31%

-3.38%

-1.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.69%

-16.99%

+7.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

3.97%

-0.81%

Volatility

IDMO vs. FEZ - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) has a higher volatility of 5.93% compared to State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) at 4.58%. This indicates that IDMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDMOFEZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.93%

4.58%

+1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.90%

15.84%

+1.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.58%

18.46%

+0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.13%

20.66%

-2.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.89%

20.68%

-2.79%

IDMO vs. FEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDMO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FEZ's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDMO vs. FEZ - Dividend Comparison

IDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, more than FEZ's 2.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEZ
State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
2.65%2.78%2.94%2.75%3.06%2.61%2.13%2.61%3.45%2.44%3.35%3.03%
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
3.75%3.71%2.24%2.89%3.66%1.81%1.63%2.78%3.27%3.08%2.18%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDMO and FEZ have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDMO has higher volatility (5.93%) compared to FEZ (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDMO dropped -39.38% vs FEZ's -64.21%.

On 10-year performance, IDMO leads with 12.15% vs 10.83% for FEZ. On fees, IDMO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FEZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IDMO has performed better with a 12.15% return vs 10.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDMO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FEZ.

IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.75%, compared with 2.65% for FEZ.

IDMO is categorized as Momentum, while FEZ is Europe Equities. IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index, while FEZ tracks EURO STOXX 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IDMO and 0.29% for FEZ.

IDMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDMO and FEZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer