PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDLV vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDLV vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDLV achieves a 2.63% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 28.45% return. Over the past 10 years, IDLV has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 5.05%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.77% annualized return.


IDLV

1D
0.27%
1M
-2.61%
YTD
2.63%
6M
4.87%
1Y
9.37%
3Y*
12.03%
5Y*
5.93%
10Y*
5.05%

SPMO

1D
-1.46%
1M
10.84%
YTD
28.45%
6M
27.50%
1Y
43.92%
3Y*
42.27%
5Y*
23.92%
10Y*
20.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDLV vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDLV
Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF
2.63%27.77%2.15%9.18%-12.21%9.76%-9.78%20.09%-8.02%22.01%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
28.45%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%27.76%

Correlation

The correlation between IDLV and SPMO is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2015

0.51

The correlation between IDLV and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.53 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IDLV vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDLV
SPMO

Financial Services

22.9%
5.9%

Industrials

16.4%
11.3%

Real Estate

15.4%
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

13.8%
4.3%

Utilities

11.4%
2.8%

Communication Services

8.6%
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

3.8%
1.3%

Energy

3.6%
3.4%

Basic Materials

2.3%
1.6%

Healthcare

1.7%
6.7%

Technology

0.7%
52.6%

Financial Services

IDLV
22.9%
SPMO
5.9%

Industrials

IDLV
16.4%
SPMO
11.3%

Real Estate

IDLV
15.4%
SPMO
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

IDLV
13.8%
SPMO
4.3%

Utilities

IDLV
11.4%
SPMO
2.8%

Communication Services

IDLV
8.6%
SPMO
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

IDLV
3.8%
SPMO
1.3%

Energy

IDLV
3.6%
SPMO
3.4%

Basic Materials

IDLV
2.3%
SPMO
1.6%

Healthcare

IDLV
1.7%
SPMO
6.7%

Technology

IDLV
0.7%
SPMO
52.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDLV vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDLV
IDLV Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
IDLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDLV Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
IDLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDLV vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDLVSPMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.44

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

3.47

-2.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.66

13.52

-9.87

IDLV vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDLV Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDLV and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDLVSPMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

2.49

-1.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

1.25

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

1.03

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

1.00

-0.55

Drawdowns

IDLV vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDLV drawdown since its inception was -34.65%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDLV and SPMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDLVSPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.65%

-30.95%

-3.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.54%

-12.70%

+5.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.97%

-20.13%

+10.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.52%

-22.74%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.65%

-30.95%

-3.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.69%

-1.46%

-4.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.95%

-4.60%

-1.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

3.26%

-0.69%

Volatility

IDLV vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV) is 2.51%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 7.39%. This indicates that IDLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDLVSPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.51%

7.39%

-4.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.65%

14.49%

-6.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.76%

17.70%

-7.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.79%

19.30%

-7.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.39%

20.31%

-6.92%

IDLV vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IDLV vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

IDLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, more than SPMO's 0.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDLV
Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF
4.69%4.63%3.41%3.59%4.69%2.99%2.30%4.92%3.94%3.05%3.92%3.93%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.66%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDLV and SPMO have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPMO has higher volatility (7.39%) compared to IDLV (2.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDLV dropped -34.65% vs SPMO's -30.95%.

On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.77% vs 5.05% for IDLV. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, IDLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.77% return vs 5.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IDLV.

IDLV has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 0.66% for SPMO.

IDLV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while SPMO is Momentum. IDLV tracks S&P BMI International Developed Low Volatility Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IDLV and 0.13% for SPMO.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDLV and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer