PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDLV vs. QLVE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDLV vs. QLVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV) and FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDLV achieves a 2.35% return, which is significantly lower than QLVE's 18.06% return.


IDLV

1D
-0.26%
1M
-1.99%
YTD
2.35%
6M
4.22%
1Y
9.36%
3Y*
11.74%
5Y*
5.88%
10Y*
5.12%

QLVE

1D
-1.29%
1M
7.29%
YTD
18.06%
6M
19.74%
1Y
34.41%
3Y*
18.46%
5Y*
7.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDLV vs. QLVE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IDLV
Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF
2.35%27.77%2.15%9.18%-12.21%9.76%-9.78%4.07%
QLVE
FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
18.06%21.87%10.17%8.53%-13.10%0.90%4.16%4.98%

Correlation

The correlation between IDLV and QLVE is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019

0.65

The correlation between IDLV and QLVE shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IDLV vs. QLVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDLV
QLVE

Financial Services

22.9%
38.5%

Industrials

16.4%
7.1%

Real Estate

15.4%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

13.8%
10.8%

Utilities

11.4%
5.4%

Communication Services

8.6%
18.4%

Consumer Cyclical

3.8%
10.4%

Energy

3.6%
7.2%

Basic Materials

2.3%
5.5%

Healthcare

1.7%
7.6%

Technology

0.7%
59.6%

Financial Services

IDLV
22.9%
QLVE
38.5%

Industrials

IDLV
16.4%
QLVE
7.1%

Real Estate

IDLV
15.4%
QLVE
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

IDLV
13.8%
QLVE
10.8%

Utilities

IDLV
11.4%
QLVE
5.4%

Communication Services

IDLV
8.6%
QLVE
18.4%

Consumer Cyclical

IDLV
3.8%
QLVE
10.4%

Energy

IDLV
3.6%
QLVE
7.2%

Basic Materials

IDLV
2.3%
QLVE
5.5%

Healthcare

IDLV
1.7%
QLVE
7.6%

Technology

IDLV
0.7%
QLVE
59.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDLV vs. QLVE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDLV
IDLV Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
IDLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDLV Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
IDLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

QLVE
QLVE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
QLVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLVE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QLVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLVE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDLV vs. QLVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV) and FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDLVQLVEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.42

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

2.98

-1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.69

11.97

-8.28

IDLV vs. QLVE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDLV Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the QLVE Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDLV and QLVE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDLVQLVEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

2.10

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.55

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.48

-0.03

Drawdowns

IDLV vs. QLVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDLV drawdown since its inception was -34.65%, which is greater than QLVE's maximum drawdown of -29.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDLV and QLVE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDLVQLVEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.65%

-29.96%

-4.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.54%

-11.60%

+4.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.97%

-13.29%

+3.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.52%

-23.94%

+1.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.95%

-1.29%

-4.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.95%

-8.29%

+2.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

2.88%

-0.34%

Volatility

IDLV vs. QLVE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV) is 2.69%, while FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) has a volatility of 6.82%. This indicates that IDLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDLVQLVEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.69%

6.82%

-4.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.65%

14.82%

-7.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.79%

16.46%

-6.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.80%

13.48%

-1.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.40%

15.79%

-2.39%

IDLV vs. QLVE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than QLVE's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDLV vs. QLVE - Dividend Comparison

IDLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, more than QLVE's 2.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDLV
Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF
4.71%4.63%3.41%3.59%4.69%2.99%2.30%4.92%3.94%3.05%3.92%3.93%
QLVE
FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
2.42%3.14%3.11%3.00%2.48%2.57%1.66%1.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDLV and QLVE have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QLVE has higher volatility (6.82%) compared to IDLV (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDLV dropped -34.65% vs QLVE's -29.96%.

On 5-year performance, QLVE leads with 7.43% vs 5.88% for IDLV. On fees, IDLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IDLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QLVE has performed better with a 7.43% return vs 5.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for QLVE.

IDLV has the higher dividend yield at 4.71%, compared with 2.42% for QLVE.

IDLV tracks S&P BMI International Developed Low Volatility Index, while QLVE tracks Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IDLV and 0.40% for QLVE.

QLVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDLV and QLVE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer