IDGT vs. TLT
IDGT (iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF) and TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while TLT is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IDGT returned 14.38%/yr vs -1.66%/yr for TLT. At a correlation of -0.21, they often move in opposite directions. IDGT charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for TLT.
Performance
IDGT vs. TLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDGT achieves a 53.90% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's -0.27% return. Over the past 10 years, IDGT has outperformed TLT with an annualized return of 14.38%, while TLT has yielded a comparatively lower -1.66% annualized return.
IDGT
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- 8.43%
- YTD
- 53.90%
- 6M
- 49.82%
- 1Y
- 63.37%
- 3Y*
- 25.08%
- 5Y*
- 13.30%
- 10Y*
- 14.38%
TLT
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- YTD
- -0.27%
- 6M
- -2.02%
- 1Y
- 4.93%
- 3Y*
- -1.80%
- 5Y*
- -6.31%
- 10Y*
- -1.66%
IDGT vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDGT iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF | 53.90% | 6.79% | 26.71% | -6.09% | -17.90% | 42.14% | 8.78% | 17.39% | -1.97% | 11.81% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | -0.27% | 4.25% | -8.05% | 2.77% | -31.23% | -4.60% | 18.15% | 14.12% | -1.61% | 9.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDGT and TLT is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2002 | -0.21 |
The correlation between IDGT and TLT shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDGT vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank
IDGT
TLT
IDGT vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IDGT | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.09 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.54 | 0.65 | +6.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.58 | 1.63 | +20.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IDGT | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.13 | 0.51 | +2.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | -0.40 | +0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | -0.11 | +0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.26 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
IDGT vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDGT drawdown since its inception was -77.95%, which is greater than TLT's maximum drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDGT and TLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDGT | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.95% | -48.35% | -29.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.45% | -7.58% | -0.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.74% | -19.18% | -4.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.83% | -43.70% | +7.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.88% | -48.35% | +11.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.58% | -40.44% | +38.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.91% | -13.82% | -6.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 3.04% | -0.23% |
Volatility
IDGT vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) has a higher volatility of 7.87% compared to iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) at 2.76%. This indicates that IDGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDGT | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.87% | 2.76% | +5.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.35% | 6.50% | +9.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.41% | 9.77% | +10.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.20% | 15.87% | +7.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.29% | 14.91% | +8.38% |
IDGT vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDGT has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDGT vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison
IDGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than TLT's 4.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDGT iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF | 0.72% | 1.17% | 1.64% | 0.37% | 0.30% | 0.28% | 0.60% | 0.42% | 0.65% | 0.57% | 0.75% | 0.72% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.59% | 4.43% | 4.30% | 3.38% | 2.67% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 2.27% | 2.63% | 2.43% | 2.60% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDGT and TLT have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IDGT has higher volatility (7.87%) compared to TLT (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDGT dropped -77.95% vs TLT's -48.35%.
On 10-year performance, IDGT leads with 14.38% vs -1.66% for TLT. On fees, TLT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TLT has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IDGT has performed better with a 14.38% return vs -1.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TLT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for IDGT.
TLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 0.72% for IDGT.
IDGT is categorized as Technology Equities, while TLT is Government Bonds. IDGT tracks S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while TLT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for IDGT and 0.15% for TLT.
IDGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDGT and TLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer