IDGT vs. SCHC
IDGT (iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF) and SCHC (Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SCHC is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed Small Cap ex U.S. Liquid Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IDGT returned 14.61%/yr vs 8.68%/yr for SCHC. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDGT charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for SCHC.
Performance
IDGT vs. SCHC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDGT achieves a 48.60% return, which is significantly higher than SCHC's 8.19% return. Over the past 10 years, IDGT has outperformed SCHC with an annualized return of 14.61%, while SCHC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.68% annualized return.
IDGT
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- 48.60%
- 6M
- 47.03%
- 1Y
- 58.23%
- 3Y*
- 24.83%
- 5Y*
- 12.59%
- 10Y*
- 14.61%
SCHC
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -1.97%
- YTD
- 8.19%
- 6M
- 8.34%
- 1Y
- 24.95%
- 3Y*
- 18.14%
- 5Y*
- 6.51%
- 10Y*
- 8.68%
IDGT vs. SCHC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDGT iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF | 48.60% | 6.79% | 26.71% | -6.09% | -17.90% | 42.14% | 8.78% | 17.39% | -1.97% | 11.81% |
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 8.19% | 37.59% | 1.97% | 14.36% | -21.74% | 12.02% | 10.48% | 23.10% | -18.60% | 29.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDGT and SCHC is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2010 | 0.64 |
The correlation between IDGT and SCHC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
IDGT vs. SCHC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IDGT
SCHC
Technology
Real Estate
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Technology
IDGT
SCHC
Real Estate
IDGT
SCHC
Communication Services
IDGT
SCHC
Basic Materials
IDGT
-
SCHC
Consumer Cyclical
IDGT
-
SCHC
Consumer Defensive
IDGT
-
SCHC
Energy
IDGT
-
SCHC
Financial Services
IDGT
-
SCHC
Healthcare
IDGT
-
SCHC
Industrials
IDGT
-
SCHC
Utilities
IDGT
-
SCHC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDGT vs. SCHC — Risk / Return Rank
IDGT
SCHC
IDGT vs. SCHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) and Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDGT | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.28 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.49 | 2.01 | +4.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.73 | 7.33 | +11.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDGT vs. SCHC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDGT drawdown since its inception was -77.95%, which is greater than SCHC's maximum drawdown of -43.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDGT and SCHC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDGT | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.95% | -43.94% | -34.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.02% | -12.48% | +3.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.74% | -15.52% | -8.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.83% | -36.48% | +0.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.88% | -43.94% | +7.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.96% | -4.42% | -0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.88% | -10.04% | -9.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 3.41% | -0.29% |
Volatility
IDGT vs. SCHC - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) has a higher volatility of 9.03% compared to Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) at 5.84%. This indicates that IDGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDGT | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.03% | 5.84% | +3.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.48% | 13.93% | +3.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.36% | 16.20% | +5.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.34% | 17.61% | +5.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.38% | 18.00% | +5.38% |
IDGT vs. SCHC - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDGT has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHC's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDGT vs. SCHC - Dividend Comparison
IDGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than SCHC's 3.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDGT iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF | 0.72% | 1.17% | 1.64% | 0.37% | 0.30% | 0.28% | 0.60% | 0.42% | 0.65% | 0.57% | 0.75% | 0.72% |
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 3.38% | 3.66% | 3.72% | 2.94% | 1.78% | 3.02% | 1.62% | 3.23% | 2.51% | 2.73% | 2.01% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDGT and SCHC have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IDGT has higher volatility (9.03%) compared to SCHC (5.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDGT dropped -77.95% vs SCHC's -43.94%.
On 10-year performance, IDGT leads with 14.61% vs 8.68% for SCHC. On fees, SCHC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, SCHC has been the lower-risk option at 5.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IDGT has performed better with a 14.61% return vs 8.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for IDGT.
SCHC has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 0.72% for IDGT.
IDGT is categorized as Technology Equities, while SCHC is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. IDGT tracks S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SCHC tracks FTSE Developed Small Cap ex U.S. Liquid Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for IDGT and 0.08% for SCHC.
IDGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDGT and SCHC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer