PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDGT vs. SCHC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDGT vs. SCHC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) and Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDGT achieves a 48.60% return, which is significantly higher than SCHC's 8.19% return. Over the past 10 years, IDGT has outperformed SCHC with an annualized return of 14.61%, while SCHC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.68% annualized return.


IDGT

1D
1.64%
1M
1.10%
YTD
48.60%
6M
47.03%
1Y
58.23%
3Y*
24.83%
5Y*
12.59%
10Y*
14.61%

SCHC

1D
-0.20%
1M
-1.97%
YTD
8.19%
6M
8.34%
1Y
24.95%
3Y*
18.14%
5Y*
6.51%
10Y*
8.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDGT vs. SCHC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDGT
iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF
48.60%6.79%26.71%-6.09%-17.90%42.14%8.78%17.39%-1.97%11.81%
SCHC
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
8.19%37.59%1.97%14.36%-21.74%12.02%10.48%23.10%-18.60%29.42%

Correlation

The correlation between IDGT and SCHC is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2010

0.64

The correlation between IDGT and SCHC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

IDGT vs. SCHC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDGT
SCHC

Technology

56.9%
6.7%

Real Estate

35.5%
5.0%

Communication Services

6.7%
2.2%

Basic Materials

-

11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

7.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.1%

Energy

-

4.4%

Financial Services

-

13.1%

Healthcare

-

3.7%

Industrials

-

16.1%

Utilities

-

2.2%

Technology

IDGT
56.9%
SCHC
6.7%

Real Estate

IDGT
35.5%
SCHC
5.0%

Communication Services

IDGT
6.7%
SCHC
2.2%

Basic Materials

IDGT

-

SCHC
11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

IDGT

-

SCHC
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

IDGT

-

SCHC
3.1%

Energy

IDGT

-

SCHC
4.4%

Financial Services

IDGT

-

SCHC
13.1%

Healthcare

IDGT

-

SCHC
3.7%

Industrials

IDGT

-

SCHC
16.1%

Utilities

IDGT

-

SCHC
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDGT vs. SCHC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDGT
IDGT Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
IDGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDGT Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IDGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDGT Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHC
SCHC Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
SCHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHC Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHC Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDGT vs. SCHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) and Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDGTSCHCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.28

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.49

2.01

+4.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.73

7.33

+11.40

IDGT vs. SCHC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDGT Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is higher than the SCHC Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDGT and SCHC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDGT vs. SCHC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDGT drawdown since its inception was -77.95%, which is greater than SCHC's maximum drawdown of -43.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDGT and SCHC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDGTSCHCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.95%

-43.94%

-34.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.02%

-12.48%

+3.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.74%

-15.52%

-8.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.83%

-36.48%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.88%

-43.94%

+7.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.96%

-4.42%

-0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.88%

-10.04%

-9.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

3.41%

-0.29%

Volatility

IDGT vs. SCHC - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) has a higher volatility of 9.03% compared to Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) at 5.84%. This indicates that IDGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDGTSCHCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.03%

5.84%

+3.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.48%

13.93%

+3.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.36%

16.20%

+5.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.34%

17.61%

+5.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.38%

18.00%

+5.38%

IDGT vs. SCHC - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDGT has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHC's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDGT vs. SCHC - Dividend Comparison

IDGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than SCHC's 3.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDGT
iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF
0.72%1.17%1.64%0.37%0.30%0.28%0.60%0.42%0.65%0.57%0.75%0.72%
SCHC
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
3.38%3.66%3.72%2.94%1.78%3.02%1.62%3.23%2.51%2.73%2.01%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDGT and SCHC have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDGT has higher volatility (9.03%) compared to SCHC (5.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDGT dropped -77.95% vs SCHC's -43.94%.

On 10-year performance, IDGT leads with 14.61% vs 8.68% for SCHC. On fees, SCHC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, SCHC has been the lower-risk option at 5.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IDGT has performed better with a 14.61% return vs 8.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for IDGT.

SCHC has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 0.72% for IDGT.

IDGT is categorized as Technology Equities, while SCHC is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. IDGT tracks S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SCHC tracks FTSE Developed Small Cap ex U.S. Liquid Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for IDGT and 0.08% for SCHC.

IDGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDGT and SCHC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer