PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDEV vs. IMCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDEV vs. IMCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDEV achieves a 9.59% return, which is significantly lower than IMCB's 15.22% return.


IDEV

1D
0.42%
1M
2.88%
YTD
9.59%
6M
11.02%
1Y
23.58%
3Y*
17.03%
5Y*
8.52%
10Y*

IMCB

1D
1.00%
1M
5.50%
YTD
15.22%
6M
14.34%
1Y
24.76%
3Y*
16.91%
5Y*
8.79%
10Y*
11.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDEV vs. IMCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDEV
iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF
9.59%32.56%4.54%17.36%-14.99%13.00%8.32%23.12%-14.10%17.43%
IMCB
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
15.22%10.25%15.10%16.37%-16.09%22.81%13.35%31.49%-11.53%13.84%

Correlation

The correlation between IDEV and IMCB is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2017

0.78

The correlation between IDEV and IMCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

IDEV vs. IMCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDEV
IMCB

Financial Services

24.0%
11.9%

Industrials

18.8%
18.5%

Technology

11.1%
22.6%

Healthcare

8.5%
7.9%

Basic Materials

8.3%
5.3%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.8%
5.1%

Energy

5.4%
6.7%

Communication Services

4.3%
2.5%

Utilities

3.4%
6.0%

Real Estate

2.7%
4.3%

Financial Services

IDEV
24.0%
IMCB
11.9%

Industrials

IDEV
18.8%
IMCB
18.5%

Technology

IDEV
11.1%
IMCB
22.6%

Healthcare

IDEV
8.5%
IMCB
7.9%

Basic Materials

IDEV
8.3%
IMCB
5.3%

Consumer Cyclical

IDEV
7.7%
IMCB
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

IDEV
5.8%
IMCB
5.1%

Energy

IDEV
5.4%
IMCB
6.7%

Communication Services

IDEV
4.3%
IMCB
2.5%

Utilities

IDEV
3.4%
IMCB
6.0%

Real Estate

IDEV
2.7%
IMCB
4.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDEV vs. IMCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDEV
IDEV Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
IDEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDEV Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
IDEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDEV Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

IMCB
IMCB Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
IMCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMCB Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
IMCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMCB Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDEV vs. IMCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDEVIMCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.31

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

2.92

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.76

11.45

-3.69

IDEV vs. IMCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDEV Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the IMCB Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDEV and IMCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDEV vs. IMCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDEV drawdown since its inception was -34.77%, smaller than the maximum IMCB drawdown of -58.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDEV and IMCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDEVIMCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.77%

-58.80%

+24.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.20%

-8.05%

-3.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.41%

-19.80%

+6.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.15%

-25.15%

-4.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-0.26%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.55%

-7.72%

+1.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

2.05%

+0.82%

Volatility

IDEV vs. IMCB - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV) has a higher volatility of 5.30% compared to iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB) at 4.70%. This indicates that IDEV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDEVIMCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.30%

4.70%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.73%

10.18%

+2.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.07%

13.25%

+1.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.35%

17.64%

-1.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.29%

19.67%

-2.38%

IDEV vs. IMCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDEV has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCB's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IDEV vs. IMCB - Dividend Comparison

IDEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, more than IMCB's 1.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDEV
iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF
3.11%3.40%3.30%3.07%2.69%3.05%2.00%3.18%3.16%1.54%0.00%0.00%
IMCB
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
1.21%1.42%1.43%1.55%1.70%1.08%1.12%1.32%1.80%1.31%1.79%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDEV and IMCB have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDEV has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to IMCB (4.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDEV dropped -34.77% vs IMCB's -58.80%.

On 5-year performance, IMCB leads with 8.79% vs 8.52% for IDEV. On fees, IMCB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IMCB has been the lower-risk option at 4.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IMCB has performed better with a 8.79% return vs 8.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IMCB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for IDEV.

IDEV has the higher dividend yield at 3.11%, compared with 1.21% for IMCB.

IDEV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IMCB is Mid Cap Blend Equities. IDEV tracks MSCI World ex USA Investable Market Index, while IMCB tracks IMCB-US - Morningstar U.S. Mid Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for IDEV and 0.04% for IMCB.

IMCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDEV and IMCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer