IDEQ vs. RODM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IDEQ (Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF) and RODM (Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. IDEQ is actively managed, while RODM is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IDEQ charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for RODM.

Performance

IDEQ vs. RODM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF (IDEQ) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDEQ achieves a 16.67% return, which is significantly higher than RODM's 10.99% return.

IDEQ

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: 4.76%
• YTD: 16.67%
• 6M: 20.65%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RODM

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 1.13%
• YTD: 10.99%
• 6M: 14.14%
• 1Y: 25.48%
• 3Y*: 20.42%
• 5Y*: 9.57%
• 10Y*: 8.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDEQ vs. RODM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IDEQ Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF	16.67%	11.77%
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF	10.99%	6.27%

Correlation

The correlation between IDEQ and RODM is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2025	0.81

Return for Risk

IDEQ vs. RODM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RODM

RODM Risk / Return Rank: 73
RODM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
RODM Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
RODM Omega Ratio Rank: 73
RODM Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
RODM Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDEQ vs. RODM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF (IDEQ) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IDEQ	RODM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.39	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.72	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.30	0.52	+1.79

Drawdowns

IDEQ vs. RODM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDEQ drawdown since its inception was -12.95%, smaller than the maximum RODM drawdown of -35.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDEQ and RODM.

Drawdown Indicators

	IDEQ	RODM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.95%	-35.98%	+23.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.10%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-10.58%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.85%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.87%	-1.42%	+0.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.10%	-6.38%	+4.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.76%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IDEQ	RODM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.12%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.41%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.39%	10.74%	+7.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.39%	13.43%	+4.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.39%	15.24%	+3.15%

IDEQ vs. RODM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDEQ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than RODM's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

IDEQ vs. RODM - Dividend Comparison

IDEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than RODM's 2.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IDEQ Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF	0.52%	0.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF	2.80%	3.11%	4.09%	4.42%	3.81%	4.41%	2.82%	2.82%	2.03%	2.24%	3.19%	2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IDEQ and RODM in my portfolio?

IDEQ and RODM have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IDEQ or RODM?

On fees, RODM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IDEQ or RODM?

RODM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IDEQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IDEQ or RODM?

RODM has the higher dividend yield at 2.80%, compared with 0.52% for IDEQ.

What is the main difference between IDEQ and RODM?

They also come from different issuers: Lazard and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IDEQ and 0.29% for RODM.