IDEC vs. QCAP

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

IDEC (Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - December) and QCAP (FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April) are both exchange-traded funds - IDEC is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while QCAP is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by FT Vest. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, IDEC returned 13.46% vs 9.90% for QCAP. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDEC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for QCAP.

Performance

IDEC vs. QCAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - December (IDEC) and FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April (QCAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDEC achieves a 4.16% return, which is significantly higher than QCAP's 3.76% return.

IDEC

• 1D: -1.58%
• 1M: -1.26%
• YTD: 4.16%
• 6M: 5.44%
• 1Y: 13.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QCAP

• 1D: -1.40%
• 1M: 0.02%
• YTD: 3.76%
• 6M: 4.33%
• 1Y: 9.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDEC vs. QCAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IDEC Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - December	4.16%	21.78%	1.09%
QCAP FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April	3.76%	7.13%	10.40%

Correlation

The correlation between IDEC and QCAP is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2024	0.58

The correlation between IDEC and QCAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IDEC vs. QCAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDEC

IDEC Risk / Return Rank: 49
IDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
IDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
IDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 52
IDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
IDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 51

QCAP

QCAP Risk / Return Rank: 95
QCAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
QCAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
QCAP Omega Ratio Rank: 96
QCAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
QCAP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDEC vs. QCAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - December (IDEC) and FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April (QCAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IDEC	QCAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	3.30	-1.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	4.79	-2.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.81	-0.51
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.97	6.73	-4.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.03	52.88	-44.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IDEC vs. QCAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDEC Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is lower than the QCAP Sharpe Ratio of 3.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDEC and QCAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IDEC	QCAP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.55	3.30	-1.75
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.28	1.16	+0.11

Drawdowns

IDEC vs. QCAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDEC drawdown since its inception was -8.51%, smaller than the maximum QCAP drawdown of -9.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDEC and QCAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	IDEC	QCAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.51%	-9.17%	+0.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.87%	-1.48%	-5.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.61%	-1.48%	-0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.54%	-0.52%	-1.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.68%	0.19%	+1.49%

Volatility

IDEC vs. QCAP - Volatility Comparison

Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - December (IDEC) has a higher volatility of 2.67% compared to FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April (QCAP) at 1.71%. This indicates that IDEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QCAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IDEC	QCAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.67%	1.71%	+0.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.60%	2.42%	+5.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.74%	3.03%	+5.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.68%	8.77%	+0.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.68%	8.77%	+0.91%

IDEC vs. QCAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDEC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than QCAP's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

IDEC vs. QCAP - Dividend Comparison

Neither IDEC nor QCAP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IDEC and QCAP in my portfolio?

IDEC and QCAP have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IDEC or QCAP?

IDEC has higher volatility (2.67%) compared to QCAP (1.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDEC dropped -8.51% vs QCAP's -9.17%.

Which ETF is better, IDEC or QCAP?

On 1-year performance, IDEC leads with 13.46% vs 9.90% for QCAP. On fees, IDEC is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, QCAP has been the lower-risk option at 1.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IDEC or QCAP?

Over the 1-year period, IDEC has performed better with a 13.46% return vs 9.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IDEC or QCAP?

IDEC is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for QCAP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IDEC or QCAP?

IDEC and QCAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between IDEC and QCAP?

IDEC is categorized as Options Trading, while QCAP is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IDEC and 0.90% for QCAP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QCAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.