IDCBY vs. ADYEN.AS
Compare and contrast key facts about Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) and Adyen N.V. (ADYEN.AS).
Performance
IDCBY vs. ADYEN.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IDCBY vs. ADYEN.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDCBY Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited | 8.84% | 32.13% | 47.21% | 3.91% | -2.05% | -6.39% | -12.54% | 13.02% | -9.04% |
ADYEN.AS Adyen N.V. | -37.99% | 8.54% | 15.56% | -6.59% | -47.61% | 13.07% | 183.67% | 50.89% | 1.34% |
Different Trading Currencies
IDCBY is traded in USD, while ADYEN.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ADYEN.AS values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDCBY achieves a 8.84% return, which is significantly higher than ADYEN.AS's -37.99% return.
IDCBY
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 8.34%
- YTD
- 8.84%
- 6M
- 22.14%
- 1Y
- 31.01%
- 3Y*
- 28.30%
- 5Y*
- 12.53%
- 10Y*
- 12.36%
ADYEN.AS
- 1D
- 1.91%
- 1M
- -11.29%
- YTD
- -37.99%
- 6M
- -37.59%
- 1Y
- -34.43%
- 3Y*
- -14.14%
- 5Y*
- -15.57%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDCBY vs. ADYEN.AS — Risk / Return Rank
IDCBY
ADYEN.AS
IDCBY vs. ADYEN.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) and Adyen N.V. (ADYEN.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IDCBY | ADYEN.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.56 | -0.82 | +2.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.20 | -0.98 | +3.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 0.86 | +0.41 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | -0.54 | +2.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.54 | -1.22 | +8.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IDCBY | ADYEN.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | -0.82 | +2.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | -0.30 | +0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.17 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between IDCBY and ADYEN.AS is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
IDCBY vs. ADYEN.AS - Dividend Comparison
IDCBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, while ADYEN.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDCBY Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited | 4.88% | 7.76% | 6.36% | 8.69% | 8.61% | 7.32% | 4.84% | 3.91% | 4.48% | 3.49% | 12.32% | 7.11% |
ADYEN.AS Adyen N.V. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IDCBY vs. ADYEN.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDCBY drawdown since its inception was -78.73%, roughly equal to the maximum ADYEN.AS drawdown of -79.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDCBY and ADYEN.AS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDCBY | ADYEN.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.73% | -77.19% | -1.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.37% | -51.25% | +38.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.39% | -77.19% | +46.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.11% | -68.77% | +65.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.49% | -31.37% | -18.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.02% | 23.68% | -19.66% |
Volatility
IDCBY vs. ADYEN.AS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) is 6.05%, while Adyen N.V. (ADYEN.AS) has a volatility of 8.32%. This indicates that IDCBY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ADYEN.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IDCBY | ADYEN.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.05% | 8.32% | -2.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.05% | 35.05% | -22.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.96% | 41.78% | -21.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.29% | 51.97% | -30.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.97% | 48.55% | -25.58% |
Financials
IDCBY vs. ADYEN.AS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited and Adyen N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities