IDCBY vs. 1211.HK

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) and BYD Co Ltd-H (1211.HK).

Performance

IDCBY vs. 1211.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) and BYD Co Ltd-H (1211.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IDCBY vs. 1211.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IDCBY Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited	8.84%	32.13%	47.21%	3.91%	-2.05%	-6.39%	-12.54%	13.02%	-8.08%	42.02%
1211.HK BYD Co Ltd-H	9.07%	10.74%	26.87%	11.89%	-27.85%	30.59%	426.17%	-21.43%	-26.56%	66.20%

Different Trading Currencies

IDCBY is traded in USD, while 1211.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 1211.HK values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IDCBY having a 8.84% return and 1211.HK slightly higher at 9.07%. Over the past 10 years, IDCBY has underperformed 1211.HK with an annualized return of 12.36%, while 1211.HK has yielded a comparatively higher 22.75% annualized return.

IDCBY

• 1D: -0.90%
• 1M: 8.34%
• YTD: 8.84%
• 6M: 22.14%
• 1Y: 31.01%
• 3Y*: 28.30%
• 5Y*: 12.53%
• 10Y*: 12.36%

1211.HK

• 1D: -0.99%
• 1M: 5.48%
• YTD: 9.07%
• 6M: -5.62%
• 1Y: -16.49%
• 3Y*: 13.04%
• 5Y*: 13.15%
• 10Y*: 22.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

IDCBY vs. 1211.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDCBY

IDCBY Risk / Return Rank: 81
IDCBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
IDCBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
IDCBY Omega Ratio Rank: 77
IDCBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
IDCBY Martin Ratio Rank: 84

1211.HK

1211.HK Risk / Return Rank: 24
1211.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
1211.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
1211.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 23
1211.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
1211.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDCBY vs. 1211.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) and BYD Co Ltd-H (1211.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IDCBY	1211.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.56	-0.41	+1.97
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.20	-0.32	+2.51
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	0.96	+0.31
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.45	-0.51	+2.96
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.54	-0.75	+8.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IDCBY vs. 1211.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDCBY Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is higher than the 1211.HK Sharpe Ratio of -0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDCBY and 1211.HK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IDCBY	1211.HK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.56	-0.41	+1.97
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	0.30	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	0.50	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.15	0.39	-0.24

Correlation

The correlation between IDCBY and 1211.HK is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

IDCBY vs. 1211.HK - Dividend Comparison

IDCBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, less than 1211.HK's 12.42% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IDCBY Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited	4.88%	7.76%	6.36%	8.69%	8.61%	7.32%	4.84%	3.91%	4.48%	3.49%	12.32%	7.11%
1211.HK BYD Co Ltd-H	12.42%	13.64%	1.28%	0.59%	0.06%	0.07%	0.03%	0.60%	0.35%	0.30%	1.03%	0.00%

Drawdowns

IDCBY vs. 1211.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDCBY drawdown since its inception was -78.73%, smaller than the maximum 1211.HK drawdown of -87.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDCBY and 1211.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	IDCBY	1211.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.73%	-87.01%	+8.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.37%	-39.99%	+27.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.39%	-50.00%	+19.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.70%	-57.94%	+18.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.11%	-30.19%	+27.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-49.49%	-34.54%	-14.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.02%	27.02%	-23.00%

Volatility

IDCBY vs. 1211.HK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) is 6.05%, while BYD Co Ltd-H (1211.HK) has a volatility of 12.12%. This indicates that IDCBY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 1211.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IDCBY	1211.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.05%	12.12%	-6.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.05%	25.19%	-12.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.96%	41.44%	-21.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.29%	45.47%	-24.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.97%	46.96%	-23.99%

Financials