ICVT vs. RSBY
ICVT (iShares Convertible Bond ETF) and RSBY (Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ICVT is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Convertible Cash Pay Bond > $250MM Index, while RSBY is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Return Stacked. ICVT is passively managed, while RSBY is actively managed. Over the past year, ICVT returned 31.84% vs 17.35% for RSBY. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. ICVT charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for RSBY.
Performance
ICVT vs. RSBY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICVT achieves a 20.52% return, which is significantly higher than RSBY's 18.52% return.
ICVT
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -1.43%
- 6M
- 16.79%
- YTD
- 20.52%
- 1Y
- 31.84%
- 3Y*
- 17.59%
- 5Y*
- 6.33%
- 10Y*
- 13.39%
RSBY
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- 6M
- 17.92%
- YTD
- 18.52%
- 1Y
- 17.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ICVT vs. RSBY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ICVT iShares Convertible Bond ETF | 20.52% | 18.10% | 7.01% |
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF | 18.52% | -12.98% | -7.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICVT and RSBY is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024 | -0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICVT vs. RSBY — Risk / Return Rank
ICVT
RSBY
ICVT vs. RSBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ICVT | RSBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.26 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.22 | 2.15 | +2.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.18 | 5.04 | +8.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ICVT vs. RSBY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICVT drawdown since its inception was -33.25%, which is greater than RSBY's maximum drawdown of -23.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICVT and RSBY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICVT | RSBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.25% | -23.32% | -9.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.55% | -7.95% | +0.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.02% | -6.45% | +1.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.44% | -13.35% | +3.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 3.39% | -0.98% |
Volatility
ICVT vs. RSBY - Volatility Comparison
iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT) has a higher volatility of 6.63% compared to Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) at 3.15%. This indicates that ICVT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICVT | RSBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.63% | 3.15% | +3.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.60% | 8.37% | +5.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.24% | 11.41% | +4.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.63% | 13.37% | +0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.65% | 13.37% | +2.28% |
ICVT vs. RSBY - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICVT has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than RSBY's 0.98% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICVT vs. RSBY - Dividend Comparison
ICVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, less than RSBY's 1.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICVT iShares Convertible Bond ETF | 1.33% | 1.73% | 2.19% | 1.85% | 1.93% | 7.70% | 3.98% | 1.86% | 4.82% | 2.56% | 3.06% | 1.57% |
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF | 1.75% | 2.07% | 2.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICVT and RSBY have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ICVT has higher volatility (6.63%) compared to RSBY (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICVT dropped -33.25% vs RSBY's -23.32%.
On 1-year performance, ICVT leads with 31.84% vs 17.35% for RSBY. On fees, ICVT is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, RSBY has been the lower-risk option at 3.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ICVT has performed better with a 31.84% return vs 17.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ICVT is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for RSBY.
RSBY has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 1.33% for ICVT.
ICVT is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while RSBY is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ICVT and 0.98% for RSBY.
ICVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ICVT and RSBY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer