ICVT vs. MSTZ
ICVT (iShares Convertible Bond ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ICVT is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Convertible Cash Pay Bond > $250MM Index, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. ICVT is passively managed, while MSTZ is actively managed. Over the past year, ICVT returned 31.84% vs 264.10% for MSTZ. At a correlation of -0.56, they often move in opposite directions. ICVT charges 0.20%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.
Performance
ICVT vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICVT achieves a 20.52% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -26.97% return.
ICVT
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -1.43%
- 6M
- 16.79%
- YTD
- 20.52%
- 1Y
- 31.84%
- 3Y*
- 17.59%
- 5Y*
- 6.33%
- 10Y*
- 13.39%
MSTZ
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- 39.32%
- 6M
- -19.19%
- YTD
- -26.97%
- 1Y
- 264.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ICVT vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ICVT iShares Convertible Bond ETF | 20.52% | 18.10% | 4.73% |
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | -26.97% | -38.95% | -94.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICVT and MSTZ is -0.53, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024 | -0.56 |
The correlation between ICVT and MSTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.56 to -0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICVT vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank
ICVT
MSTZ
ICVT vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ICVT | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.30 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.22 | 2.86 | +1.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.18 | 5.59 | +7.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ICVT vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICVT drawdown since its inception was -33.25%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICVT and MSTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICVT | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.25% | -99.38% | +66.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.55% | -84.89% | +77.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.02% | -97.51% | +92.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.44% | -94.53% | +85.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 43.41% | -41.00% |
Volatility
ICVT vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT) is 6.63%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 56.46%. This indicates that ICVT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICVT | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.63% | 56.46% | -49.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.60% | 135.20% | -121.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.24% | 148.41% | -132.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.63% | 171.17% | -157.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.65% | 171.17% | -155.52% |
ICVT vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICVT has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICVT vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison
ICVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICVT iShares Convertible Bond ETF | 1.33% | 1.73% | 2.19% | 1.85% | 1.93% | 7.70% | 3.98% | 1.86% | 4.82% | 2.56% | 3.06% | 1.57% |
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICVT and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTZ has higher volatility (56.46%) compared to ICVT (6.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICVT dropped -33.25% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.
On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 264.10% vs 31.84% for ICVT. On fees, ICVT is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ICVT has been the lower-risk option at 6.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 264.10% return vs 31.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ICVT is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.
ICVT has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.
ICVT is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ICVT and 1.05% for MSTZ.
ICVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ICVT and MSTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer