ICVT vs. FLXR
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT) and TCW Flexible Income ETF (FLXR).
ICVT and FLXR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ICVT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. Convertible Cash Pay Bond > $250MM Index. It was launched on Jun 2, 2015. FLXR is an actively managed fund by TCW. It was launched on Nov 30, 2018.
Performance
ICVT vs. FLXR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ICVT vs. FLXR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ICVT iShares Convertible Bond ETF | 4.76% | 18.10% | 10.45% |
FLXR TCW Flexible Income ETF | 0.20% | 8.37% | 4.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICVT achieves a 4.76% return, which is significantly higher than FLXR's 0.20% return.
ICVT
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- -2.51%
- YTD
- 4.76%
- 6M
- 2.81%
- 1Y
- 24.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.62%
- 5Y*
- 3.78%
- 10Y*
- 12.37%
FLXR
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -0.53%
- YTD
- 0.20%
- 6M
- 1.42%
- 1Y
- 5.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ICVT vs. FLXR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICVT has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FLXR's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ICVT vs. FLXR — Risk / Return Rank
ICVT
FLXR
ICVT vs. FLXR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT) and TCW Flexible Income ETF (FLXR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICVT | FLXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.78 | 2.31 | -0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.41 | 3.19 | -0.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.47 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.36 | 4.13 | -0.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.42 | 15.53 | -4.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICVT | FLXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.78 | 2.31 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 2.69 | -2.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between ICVT and FLXR is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ICVT vs. FLXR - Dividend Comparison
ICVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than FLXR's 5.68% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICVT iShares Convertible Bond ETF | 1.59% | 1.73% | 2.19% | 1.85% | 1.93% | 7.70% | 3.98% | 1.86% | 4.82% | 2.56% | 3.06% | 1.57% |
FLXR TCW Flexible Income ETF | 5.68% | 5.66% | 3.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ICVT vs. FLXR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICVT drawdown since its inception was -33.25%, which is greater than FLXR's maximum drawdown of -1.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICVT and FLXR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICVT | FLXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.25% | -1.94% | -31.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.55% | -1.47% | -6.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.57% | -0.88% | -1.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.64% | -0.37% | -9.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 0.39% | +1.83% |
Volatility
ICVT vs. FLXR - Volatility Comparison
iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT) has a higher volatility of 6.51% compared to TCW Flexible Income ETF (FLXR) at 1.04%. This indicates that ICVT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLXR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ICVT | FLXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.51% | 1.04% | +5.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.70% | 1.60% | +10.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.06% | 2.55% | +11.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.20% | 2.83% | +10.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.54% | 2.83% | +12.71% |