ICPY vs. VEA
ICPY (Tweedy, Browne International Insider + Value ETF) and VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. ICPY is actively managed, while VEA is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ICPY charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VEA.
Performance
ICPY vs. VEA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICPY achieves a 11.95% return, which is significantly higher than VEA's 10.91% return.
ICPY
- 1D
- -1.94%
- 1M
- -0.66%
- YTD
- 11.95%
- 6M
- 21.14%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VEA
- 1D
- -3.72%
- 1M
- -2.40%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 13.57%
- 1Y
- 27.20%
- 3Y*
- 18.26%
- 5Y*
- 8.83%
- 10Y*
- 9.63%
ICPY vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ICPY Tweedy, Browne International Insider + Value ETF | 11.95% | 13.78% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 10.91% | 7.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICPY and VEA is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICPY vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank
ICPY
VEA
ICPY vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tweedy, Browne International Insider + Value ETF (ICPY) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICPY | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.58 | 0.24 | +2.34 |
Drawdowns
ICPY vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICPY drawdown since its inception was -8.86%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICPY and VEA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICPY | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.86% | -60.68% | +51.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.26% | -4.36% | +2.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.60% | -13.29% | +11.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.99% | — |
Volatility
ICPY vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICPY | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.17% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.88% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.18% | 16.09% | -0.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 16.62% | -1.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 17.39% | -2.21% |
ICPY vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICPY has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICPY vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison
ICPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%, more than VEA's 2.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICPY Tweedy, Browne International Insider + Value ETF | 4.08% | 4.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.71% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICPY and VEA have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for ICPY.
ICPY has the higher dividend yield at 4.08%, compared with 2.71% for VEA.
They also come from different issuers: Tweedy, Browne and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for ICPY and 0.03% for VEA.
Find the right allocation for ICPY and VEA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer