ICPY vs. PATN

Last updated Jun 27, 2026

ICPY (Tweedy, Browne International Insider + Value ETF) and PATN (Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. ICPY is actively managed, while PATN is passively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ICPY charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for PATN.

Performance

ICPY vs. PATN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tweedy, Browne International Insider + Value ETF (ICPY) and Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICPY achieves a 12.60% return, which is significantly lower than PATN's 35.06% return.

ICPY

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: -1.61%
• YTD: 12.60%
• 6M: 13.91%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PATN

• 1D: -1.44%
• 1M: 0.03%
• YTD: 35.06%
• 6M: 34.62%
• 1Y: 60.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICPY vs. PATN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ICPY Tweedy, Browne International Insider + Value ETF	12.60%	13.79%
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF	35.06%	10.57%

Correlation

The correlation between ICPY and PATN is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025	0.68

Return for Risk

ICPY vs. PATN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICPY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PATN

PATN Risk / Return Rank: 87
PATN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
PATN Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
PATN Omega Ratio Rank: 87
PATN Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
PATN Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICPY vs. PATN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tweedy, Browne International Insider + Value ETF (ICPY) and Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ICPY	PATN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.55	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.17	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.46	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.24	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	16.34	—

Drawdowns

ICPY vs. PATN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICPY drawdown since its inception was -8.86%, smaller than the maximum PATN drawdown of -16.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICPY and PATN.

Drawdown Indicators

	ICPY	PATN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.86%	-16.77%	+7.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.71%	-4.89%	+2.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.57%	-3.17%	+1.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.73%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ICPY	PATN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	12.31%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	21.47%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.09%	23.91%	-8.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.09%	22.25%	-7.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.09%	22.25%	-7.16%

ICPY vs. PATN - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICPY has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than PATN's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

ICPY vs. PATN - Dividend Comparison

ICPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, more than PATN's 1.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ICPY Tweedy, Browne International Insider + Value ETF	4.05%	4.56%	0.00%
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF	1.61%	2.25%	0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ICPY and PATN in my portfolio?

ICPY and PATN have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ICPY or PATN?

On fees, PATN is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ICPY or PATN?

PATN is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for ICPY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ICPY or PATN?

ICPY has the higher dividend yield at 4.05%, compared with 1.61% for PATN.

What is the main difference between ICPY and PATN?

They also come from different issuers: Tweedy, Browne and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for ICPY and 0.65% for PATN.