PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICOW vs. BITI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICOW vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICOW achieves a 10.66% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 23.84% return.


ICOW

1D
0.35%
1M
-3.14%
6M
7.36%
YTD
10.66%
1Y
26.72%
3Y*
15.49%
5Y*
9.50%
10Y*

BITI

1D
-3.81%
1M
-2.41%
6M
34.02%
YTD
23.84%
1Y
64.31%
3Y*
-31.54%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICOW vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ICOW
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF
10.66%36.95%-2.59%18.94%2.90%
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
23.84%-1.76%-62.60%-66.17%3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between ICOW and BITI is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2022

-0.31

The correlation between ICOW and BITI shifts across timeframes, from -0.40 (1 year) to -0.26 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICOW vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICOW
ICOW Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ICOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICOW Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ICOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICOW Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

BITI
BITI Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICOW vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ICOWBITIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.24

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

2.56

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.91

6.37

+2.54

ICOW vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICOW Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICOW and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ICOW vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICOW drawdown since its inception was -43.49%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICOW and BITI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICOWBITIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.49%

-92.16%

+48.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-25.28%

+16.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.81%

-84.63%

+69.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.30%

-86.48%

+80.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.56%

-68.36%

+60.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

10.13%

-7.12%

Volatility

ICOW vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) is 4.26%, while ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) has a volatility of 11.73%. This indicates that ICOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICOWBITIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.26%

11.73%

-7.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.09%

34.49%

-22.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.70%

44.24%

-29.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.75%

52.29%

-35.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.47%

52.29%

-33.82%

ICOW vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICOW has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

ICOW vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

ICOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, less than BITI's 15.70% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
15.70%1.60%3.91%3.33%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ICOW
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF
2.30%3.03%4.39%3.61%5.26%2.11%2.46%3.10%2.61%0.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


ICOW and BITI have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITI has higher volatility (11.73%) compared to ICOW (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICOW dropped -43.49% vs BITI's -92.16%.

On 3-year performance, ICOW leads with 15.49% vs -31.54% for BITI. On fees, ICOW is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, ICOW has been the lower-risk option at 4.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, ICOW has performed better with a 15.49% return vs -31.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ICOW is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.70%, compared with 2.30% for ICOW.

ICOW is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. ICOW tracks Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index, while BITI tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ICOW and 1.03% for BITI.

ICOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICOW and BITI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer