ICOP vs. RBIL
ICOP (iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ICOP is a Copper fund tracking the STOXX Global Copper and Metals Mining Index, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ICOP returned 87.84% vs 3.81% for RBIL. Their -0.20 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. ICOP charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.
Performance
ICOP vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICOP achieves a 23.57% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.61% return.
ICOP
- 1D
- 3.14%
- 1M
- 8.99%
- 6M
- 3.94%
- YTD
- 23.57%
- 1Y
- 87.84%
- 3Y*
- 31.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 32.47%
RBIL
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 2.25%
- YTD
- 2.61%
- 1Y
- 3.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.81%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.12M | $3.58M | $5.54M | |
| $1.19M | $1.87M | $2.26M |
ICOP vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ICOP iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF | 23.57% | 72.27% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 2.61% | 2.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICOP and RBIL is -0.23, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025 | -0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICOP vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank
ICOP
RBIL
ICOP vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ICOP | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 2.00 | -0.67 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.38 | 6.80 | -3.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.73 | 27.52 | -17.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ICOP vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICOP drawdown since its inception was -38.67%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICOP and RBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICOP | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.67% | -0.56% | -38.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.13% | -0.56% | -25.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.11% | -0.22% | -5.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.75% | -0.08% | -11.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.06% | 0.14% | +8.92% |
Volatility
ICOP vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) has a higher volatility of 12.25% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.28%. This indicates that ICOP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICOP | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.25% | 0.28% | +11.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.35% | 0.89% | +33.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.06% | 0.96% | +40.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.73% | 1.06% | +33.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.73% | 1.06% | +33.67% |
ICOP vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICOP has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICOP vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison
ICOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, less than RBIL's 4.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ICOP iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF | 1.64% | 2.08% | 1.87% | 2.15% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.16% | 3.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICOP and RBIL have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ICOP has higher volatility (12.25%) compared to RBIL (0.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICOP dropped -38.67% vs RBIL's -0.56%.
On 1-year performance, ICOP leads with 87.84% vs 3.81% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ICOP has performed better with a 87.84% return vs 3.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for ICOP.
RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.16%, compared with 1.64% for ICOP.
ICOP is categorized as Copper, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. ICOP tracks STOXX Global Copper and Metals Mining Index, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for ICOP and 0.17% for RBIL.
RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.98 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ICOP and RBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer