ICOP vs. KCOP
ICOP (iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF) and KCOP (Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF) are both Copper funds. ICOP is passively managed, while KCOP is actively managed. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. ICOP charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for KCOP.
Performance
ICOP vs. KCOP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ICOP
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- 6M
- -1.66%
- YTD
- 13.30%
- 1Y
- 75.25%
- 3Y*
- 26.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 28.98%
KCOP
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 4.57%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.24M | $3.32M | $5.52M | |
| $249.14K | $314.36K | $548.92K |
ICOP vs. KCOP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ICOP iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF | -4.81% |
KCOP Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF | -2.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICOP and KCOP is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2026 | 0.96 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICOP vs. KCOP — Risk / Return Rank
ICOP
KCOP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ICOP vs. KCOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) and Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF (KCOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ICOP | KCOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.34 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ICOP vs. KCOP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICOP drawdown since its inception was -38.67%, which is greater than KCOP's maximum drawdown of -21.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICOP and KCOP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICOP | KCOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.67% | -21.55% | -17.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.92% | -10.67% | -3.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.76% | -9.65% | -2.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.99% | — | — |
Volatility
ICOP vs. KCOP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICOP | KCOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.26% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.69% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.68% | 42.43% | -1.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.64% | 42.43% | -7.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.64% | 42.43% | -7.79% |
ICOP vs. KCOP - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICOP has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than KCOP's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICOP vs. KCOP - Dividend Comparison
ICOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, less than KCOP's 6.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ICOP iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF | 1.79% | 2.08% | 1.87% | 2.15% |
KCOP Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF | 6.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, ICOP and KCOP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ICOP is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ICOP is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for KCOP.
KCOP has the higher dividend yield at 6.55%, compared with 1.79% for ICOP.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Kurv. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for ICOP and 0.99% for KCOP.
Find the right allocation for ICOP and KCOP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer