ICOP vs. IDV

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

ICOP (iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF) and IDV (iShares International Select Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ICOP is a Copper fund tracking the STOXX Global Copper and Metals Mining Index, while IDV is a Global Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ICOP returned 98.32% vs 35.47% for IDV. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ICOP charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for IDV.

Performance

ICOP vs. IDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) and iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICOP achieves a 27.00% return, which is significantly higher than IDV's 12.82% return.

ICOP

• 1D: 3.80%
• 1M: 8.46%
• YTD: 27.00%
• 6M: 33.16%
• 1Y: 98.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IDV

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: -0.26%
• YTD: 12.82%
• 6M: 14.44%
• 1Y: 35.47%
• 3Y*: 24.42%
• 5Y*: 12.20%
• 10Y*: 10.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICOP vs. IDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ICOP iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF	27.00%	78.01%	1.10%	8.08%
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF	12.82%	52.16%	4.00%	10.36%

Correlation

The correlation between ICOP and IDV is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2023	0.65

The correlation between ICOP and IDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

ICOP vs. IDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ICOP	IDV
Basic Materials	100.0%	6.3%
Communication Services	-	9.9%
Consumer Cyclical	-	9.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	7.2%
Energy	-	14.8%
Financial Services	-	30.6%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	6.9%
Real Estate	-	2.3%
Technology	-	0.9%
Utilities	-	11.5%

Return for Risk

ICOP vs. IDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICOP

ICOP Risk / Return Rank: 77
ICOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
ICOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
ICOP Omega Ratio Rank: 73
ICOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
ICOP Martin Ratio Rank: 78

IDV

IDV Risk / Return Rank: 87
IDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
IDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
IDV Omega Ratio Rank: 89
IDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
IDV Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICOP vs. IDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) and iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ICOP	IDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.52	2.73	-0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	3.57	-0.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.50	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.78	4.18	-0.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.47	15.48	-2.01

ICOP vs. IDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICOP Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the IDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICOP and IDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ICOP vs. IDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICOP drawdown since its inception was -38.67%, smaller than the maximum IDV drawdown of -70.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICOP and IDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	ICOP	IDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.67%	-70.14%	+31.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.13%	-8.52%	-17.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.86%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.19%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.51%	-2.37%	-1.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.63%	-15.38%	+3.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.33%	2.30%	+5.03%

Volatility

ICOP vs. IDV - Volatility Comparison

iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) has a higher volatility of 17.02% compared to iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) at 4.28%. This indicates that ICOP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ICOP	IDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.02%	4.28%	+12.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.42%	10.90%	+23.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.31%	13.07%	+26.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.34%	15.59%	+18.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.34%	17.93%	+16.41%

ICOP vs. IDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICOP has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than IDV's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

ICOP vs. IDV - Dividend Comparison

ICOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than IDV's 7.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ICOP iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF	2.13%	2.08%	1.87%	2.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF	7.09%	4.94%	6.46%	6.51%	7.33%	5.78%	5.47%	5.15%	5.93%	4.52%	4.69%	5.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ICOP and IDV in my portfolio?

ICOP and IDV have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ICOP or IDV?

ICOP has higher volatility (17.02%) compared to IDV (4.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICOP dropped -38.67% vs IDV's -70.14%.

Which ETF is better, ICOP or IDV?

On 1-year performance, ICOP leads with 98.32% vs 35.47% for IDV. On fees, ICOP is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, IDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ICOP or IDV?

Over the 1-year period, ICOP has performed better with a 98.32% return vs 35.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ICOP or IDV?

ICOP is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for IDV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ICOP or IDV?

IDV has the higher dividend yield at 7.09%, compared with 2.13% for ICOP.

What is the main difference between ICOP and IDV?

ICOP is categorized as Copper, while IDV is Global Equities. ICOP tracks STOXX Global Copper and Metals Mining Index, while IDV tracks Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for ICOP and 0.49% for IDV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.