ICHR vs. LITP
ICHR (Ichor Holdings, Ltd.) is a stock, while LITP (Sprott Lithium Miners ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Over the past 3 years, ICHR returned 31.96%/yr vs -0.12%/yr for LITP. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ICHR vs. LITP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICHR achieves a 293.11% return, which is significantly higher than LITP's 28.96% return.
ICHR
- 1D
- -3.34%
- 1M
- 3.92%
- YTD
- 293.11%
- 6M
- 312.82%
- 1Y
- 316.38%
- 3Y*
- 31.96%
- 5Y*
- 5.26%
- 10Y*
- —
LITP
- 1D
- -4.66%
- 1M
- -7.17%
- YTD
- 28.96%
- 6M
- 41.58%
- 1Y
- 218.79%
- 3Y*
- -0.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ICHR vs. LITP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ICHR Ichor Holdings, Ltd. | 293.11% | -42.80% | -4.19% | -9.43% |
LITP Sprott Lithium Miners ETF | 28.96% | 94.65% | -43.85% | -36.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICHR and LITP is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2023 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICHR vs. LITP — Risk / Return Rank
ICHR
LITP
ICHR vs. LITP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (ICHR) and Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICHR | LITP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.45 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.81 | 7.08 | +0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.66 | 21.48 | -3.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICHR | LITP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.46 | 3.78 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | -0.07 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
ICHR vs. LITP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICHR drawdown since its inception was -77.39%, roughly equal to the maximum LITP drawdown of -74.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICHR and LITP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICHR | LITP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.39% | -74.72% | -2.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.80% | -31.12% | -9.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.09% | -74.31% | +5.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.85% | -14.47% | +8.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.38% | -42.29% | +5.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.02% | 10.23% | +7.79% |
Volatility
ICHR vs. LITP - Volatility Comparison
Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (ICHR) has a higher volatility of 19.72% compared to Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) at 13.36%. This indicates that ICHR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LITP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICHR | LITP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.72% | 13.36% | +6.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.25% | 39.69% | +20.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 92.42% | 58.34% | +34.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.68% | 47.34% | +19.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.88% | 47.34% | +18.54% |
Dividends
ICHR vs. LITP - Dividend Comparison
ICHR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LITP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.74%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ICHR Ichor Holdings, Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LITP Sprott Lithium Miners ETF | 5.74% | 7.41% | 6.55% | 2.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICHR and LITP have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ICHR has higher volatility (19.72%) compared to LITP (13.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICHR dropped -77.39% vs LITP's -74.72%.
LITP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.78 vs 3.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ICHR and LITP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer