ICHKX vs. BGCBX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ICHKX (Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund) and BGCBX (Baillie Gifford China Equities Fund) are both China Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, ICHKX returned 6.41%/yr vs 11.01%/yr for BGCBX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ICHKX charges 1.71%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for BGCBX.

Performance

ICHKX vs. BGCBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund (ICHKX) and Baillie Gifford China Equities Fund (BGCBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ICHKX having a 0.74% return and BGCBX slightly lower at 0.72%.

ICHKX

• 1D: 1.68%
• 1M: -1.68%
• YTD: 0.74%
• 6M: 0.81%
• 1Y: 18.91%
• 3Y*: 6.41%
• 5Y*: -6.01%
• 10Y*: 4.30%

BGCBX

• 1D: 2.96%
• 1M: 1.31%
• YTD: 0.72%
• 6M: 0.75%
• 1Y: 21.74%
• 3Y*: 11.01%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICHKX vs. BGCBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ICHKX Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund	0.74%	28.97%	0.05%	-14.52%	-23.67%	-8.31%
BGCBX Baillie Gifford China Equities Fund	0.72%	36.51%	9.74%	-18.00%	-28.56%	-17.30%

Correlation

The correlation between ICHKX and BGCBX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2021	0.87

The correlation between ICHKX and BGCBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ICHKX vs. BGCBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICHKX

ICHKX Risk / Return Rank: 21
ICHKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
ICHKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
ICHKX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
ICHKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
ICHKX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

BGCBX

BGCBX Risk / Return Rank: 18
BGCBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
BGCBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
BGCBX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
BGCBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
BGCBX Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICHKX vs. BGCBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund (ICHKX) and Baillie Gifford China Equities Fund (BGCBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ICHKX	BGCBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	1.25	-0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	1.81	0.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.22	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.94	1.68	+0.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.34	4.22	+1.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ICHKX vs. BGCBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICHKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the BGCBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICHKX and BGCBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ICHKX	BGCBX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.25	1.25	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.25	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.19	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	-0.23	+0.43

Drawdowns

ICHKX vs. BGCBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICHKX drawdown since its inception was -70.67%, which is greater than BGCBX's maximum drawdown of -59.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICHKX and BGCBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ICHKX	BGCBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.67%	-59.07%	-11.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.19%	-13.48%	+3.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.10%	-28.54%	+0.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.70%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-35.90%	-27.90%	-8.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.21%	-38.29%	+11.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.69%	5.37%	-1.68%

Volatility

ICHKX vs. BGCBX - Volatility Comparison

Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund (ICHKX) and Baillie Gifford China Equities Fund (BGCBX) have volatilities of 5.56% and 5.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ICHKX	BGCBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.56%	5.62%	-0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.96%	12.57%	-1.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.86%	18.11%	-2.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.68%	27.04%	-3.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.43%	27.04%	-4.61%

ICHKX vs. BGCBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICHKX has a 1.71% expense ratio, which is higher than BGCBX's 0.96% expense ratio.

Dividends

ICHKX vs. BGCBX - Dividend Comparison

ICHKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, more than BGCBX's 0.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BGCBX Baillie Gifford China Equities Fund	0.91%	0.91%	2.03%	1.50%	0.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ICHKX Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund	1.05%	1.06%	1.11%	0.74%	0.86%	20.44%	3.57%	4.37%	12.53%	6.76%	5.31%	12.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ICHKX and BGCBX in my portfolio?

ICHKX and BGCBX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ICHKX or BGCBX?

BGCBX has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to ICHKX (5.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICHKX dropped -70.67% vs BGCBX's -59.07%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BGCBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.