ICF vs. IQLT
ICF (iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF) and IQLT (iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ICF is a REIT fund tracking the Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index, while IQLT is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ICF returned 5.99%/yr vs 10.17%/yr for IQLT. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ICF charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for IQLT.
Performance
ICF vs. IQLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICF achieves a 16.93% return, which is significantly higher than IQLT's 9.81% return. Over the past 10 years, ICF has underperformed IQLT with an annualized return of 5.99%, while IQLT has yielded a comparatively higher 10.17% annualized return.
ICF
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 3.62%
- YTD
- 16.93%
- 6M
- 17.09%
- 1Y
- 15.91%
- 3Y*
- 11.06%
- 5Y*
- 3.38%
- 10Y*
- 5.99%
IQLT
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- 9.81%
- 6M
- 11.22%
- 1Y
- 18.29%
- 3Y*
- 14.25%
- 5Y*
- 7.32%
- 10Y*
- 10.17%
ICF vs. IQLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICF iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF | 16.93% | 1.85% | 5.30% | 10.36% | -26.12% | 44.17% | -5.43% | 25.48% | -2.55% | 4.90% |
IQLT iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF | 9.81% | 25.42% | 1.54% | 18.73% | -15.22% | 12.94% | 12.48% | 28.18% | -10.76% | 24.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICF and IQLT is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2015 | 0.45 |
The correlation between ICF and IQLT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICF vs. IQLT — Risk / Return Rank
ICF
IQLT
ICF vs. IQLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) and iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ICF | IQLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.20 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 1.63 | +0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.18 | 6.18 | -1.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ICF vs. IQLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICF drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, which is greater than IQLT's maximum drawdown of -32.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICF and IQLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICF | IQLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.74% | -32.21% | -44.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.20% | -10.38% | +2.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.25% | -13.18% | -4.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.74% | -30.24% | -4.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.22% | -32.21% | -8.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.04% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.16% | -6.21% | -7.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 2.74% | +0.15% |
Volatility
ICF vs. IQLT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) is 4.74%, while iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that ICF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICF | IQLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.74% | 5.41% | -0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.33% | 12.72% | -2.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.94% | 15.00% | -1.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.95% | 16.55% | +2.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.60% | 17.00% | +3.60% |
ICF vs. IQLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICF has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than IQLT's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICF vs. IQLT - Dividend Comparison
ICF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, more than IQLT's 2.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICF iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF | 2.38% | 2.88% | 2.66% | 2.76% | 2.64% | 1.82% | 2.38% | 2.55% | 3.20% | 3.10% | 4.21% | 3.30% |
IQLT iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF | 2.12% | 2.33% | 2.87% | 2.27% | 3.14% | 2.24% | 1.61% | 2.28% | 2.72% | 2.36% | 2.91% | 2.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICF and IQLT have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IQLT has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to ICF (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICF dropped -76.74% vs IQLT's -32.21%.
On 10-year performance, IQLT leads with 10.17% vs 5.99% for ICF. On fees, IQLT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, ICF has been the lower-risk option at 4.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IQLT has performed better with a 10.17% return vs 5.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IQLT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for ICF.
ICF has the higher dividend yield at 2.38%, compared with 2.12% for IQLT.
ICF is categorized as REIT, while IQLT is Foreign Large Cap Equities. ICF tracks Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index, while IQLT tracks MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.34% for ICF and 0.30% for IQLT.
IQLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ICF and IQLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer