ICF vs. CSEIX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) and Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund, Inc. (CSEIX).
ICF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index. It was launched on Jan 29, 2001. CSEIX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Sep 2, 1997.
Performance
ICF vs. CSEIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ICF vs. CSEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICF iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF | 4.03% | 1.85% | 5.30% | 10.36% | -26.12% | 44.17% | -5.43% | 25.48% | -2.55% | 4.90% |
CSEIX Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund, Inc. | 1.43% | 4.01% | 6.50% | 12.81% | -26.47% | 41.29% | -1.99% | 31.50% | -4.52% | 7.79% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICF achieves a 4.03% return, which is significantly higher than CSEIX's 1.43% return. Over the past 10 years, ICF has underperformed CSEIX with an annualized return of 4.70%, while CSEIX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.04% annualized return.
ICF
- 1D
- 1.63%
- 1M
- -6.14%
- YTD
- 4.03%
- 6M
- 1.90%
- 1Y
- 3.34%
- 3Y*
- 6.55%
- 5Y*
- 3.65%
- 10Y*
- 4.70%
CSEIX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -7.27%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 6M
- -0.16%
- 1Y
- 2.11%
- 3Y*
- 7.33%
- 5Y*
- 4.07%
- 10Y*
- 6.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ICF vs. CSEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICF has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than CSEIX's 1.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ICF vs. CSEIX — Risk / Return Rank
ICF
CSEIX
ICF vs. CSEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) and Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund, Inc. (CSEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICF | CSEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.21 | 0.18 | +0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.39 | 0.35 | +0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.05 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 0.24 | +0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.37 | 0.93 | +0.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICF | CSEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 | 0.18 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.22 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | 0.29 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.34 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between ICF and CSEIX is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ICF vs. CSEIX - Dividend Comparison
ICF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, less than CSEIX's 3.08% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICF iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF | 2.67% | 2.88% | 2.66% | 2.76% | 2.64% | 1.82% | 2.38% | 2.55% | 3.20% | 3.10% | 4.21% | 3.30% |
CSEIX Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund, Inc. | 3.08% | 3.75% | 2.72% | 2.89% | 7.91% | 4.37% | 5.48% | 7.83% | 3.51% | 2.39% | 5.87% | 23.00% |
Drawdowns
ICF vs. CSEIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICF drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, which is greater than CSEIX's maximum drawdown of -72.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICF and CSEIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICF | CSEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.74% | -72.58% | -4.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.77% | -11.83% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.74% | -33.25% | -1.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.22% | -42.75% | +2.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.04% | -7.64% | -1.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.26% | -10.79% | -3.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.24% | 3.01% | +0.23% |
Volatility
ICF vs. CSEIX - Volatility Comparison
iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) and Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund, Inc. (CSEIX) have volatilities of 4.43% and 4.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ICF | CSEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.43% | 4.34% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.64% | 9.50% | +0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.33% | 15.96% | +0.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.91% | 18.85% | +0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.59% | 20.92% | -0.33% |