PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSEIX vs. TRBCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSEIX vs. TRBCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund, Inc. (CSEIX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSEIX achieves a 13.06% return, which is significantly higher than TRBCX's 0.19% return. Over the past 10 years, CSEIX has underperformed TRBCX with an annualized return of 7.00%, while TRBCX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.70% annualized return.


CSEIX

1D
1.29%
1M
-0.55%
YTD
13.06%
6M
13.77%
1Y
11.65%
3Y*
12.10%
5Y*
3.82%
10Y*
7.00%

TRBCX

1D
-1.60%
1M
-3.26%
YTD
0.19%
6M
-0.94%
1Y
15.20%
3Y*
25.86%
5Y*
11.30%
10Y*
17.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSEIX vs. TRBCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSEIX
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund, Inc.
13.06%4.01%6.50%12.81%-26.47%41.29%-1.99%31.50%-4.52%7.79%
TRBCX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund
0.19%18.78%48.46%49.42%-38.57%17.54%34.73%29.97%2.00%36.54%

Correlation

The correlation between CSEIX and TRBCX is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 1997

0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between CSEIX and TRBCX has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSEIX vs. TRBCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSEIX
CSEIX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
CSEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
CSEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

TRBCX
TRBCX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
TRBCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRBCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRBCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
TRBCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRBCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSEIX vs. TRBCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund, Inc. (CSEIX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSEIXTRBCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.17

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

0.98

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.91

3.23

+1.68

CSEIX vs. TRBCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSEIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is comparable to the TRBCX Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSEIX and TRBCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSEIX vs. TRBCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSEIX drawdown since its inception was -72.58%, which is greater than TRBCX's maximum drawdown of -54.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSEIX and TRBCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSEIXTRBCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.58%

-54.56%

-18.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.92%

-17.01%

+9.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.31%

-23.08%

+5.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.25%

-43.63%

+10.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.75%

-43.63%

+0.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.69%

-5.67%

+3.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.71%

-11.29%

+0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

5.14%

-2.45%

Volatility

CSEIX vs. TRBCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund, Inc. (CSEIX) is 5.14%, while T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX) has a volatility of 6.46%. This indicates that CSEIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRBCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSEIXTRBCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.14%

6.46%

-1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.65%

14.49%

-3.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.89%

17.62%

-3.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.90%

24.16%

-5.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.98%

22.87%

-1.89%

CSEIX vs. TRBCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSEIX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than TRBCX's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSEIX vs. TRBCX - Dividend Comparison

CSEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, less than TRBCX's 5.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSEIX
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund, Inc.
3.38%3.75%2.72%2.89%7.91%4.37%5.48%7.83%3.51%2.39%5.87%23.00%
TRBCX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund
5.24%5.25%18.16%3.49%5.87%9.38%1.19%0.36%2.44%2.94%0.67%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSEIX and TRBCX have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRBCX has higher volatility (6.46%) compared to CSEIX (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSEIX dropped -72.58% vs TRBCX's -54.56%.

CSEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSEIX and TRBCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer