ICE vs. CBOE

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

ICE (Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.) and CBOE (Cboe Global Markets, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Financial Data & Stock Exchanges industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, ICE returned 11.69%/yr vs 17.38%/yr for CBOE. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ICE vs. CBOE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) and Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICE achieves a -13.87% return, which is significantly lower than CBOE's 12.19% return. Over the past 10 years, ICE has underperformed CBOE with an annualized return of 11.69%, while CBOE has yielded a comparatively higher 17.38% annualized return.

ICE

• 1D: -1.73%
• 1M: -10.76%
• YTD: -13.87%
• 6M: -10.90%
• 1Y: -21.27%
• 3Y*: 9.51%
• 5Y*: 6.00%
• 10Y*: 11.69%

CBOE

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: -19.41%
• YTD: 12.19%
• 6M: 11.21%
• 1Y: 27.25%
• 3Y*: 27.99%
• 5Y*: 21.30%
• 10Y*: 17.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICE vs. CBOE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ICE Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.	-13.87%	9.92%	17.46%	27.12%	-23.91%	19.94%	26.15%	24.47%	8.11%	26.60%
CBOE Cboe Global Markets, Inc.	12.19%	29.96%	10.74%	44.37%	-2.16%	42.23%	-21.17%	24.16%	-20.60%	70.49%

Correlation

The correlation between ICE and CBOE is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2010	0.43

The correlation between ICE and CBOE shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (3 years) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap ICE : $79.26B CBOE : $29.43B
EPS ICE : $6.85 CBOE : $11.77
PE Ratio ICE : 20.31 CBOE : 23.83
PEG Ratio ICE : 2.45 CBOE : 0.44
PS Ratio ICE : 6.09 CBOE : 6.14
PB Ratio ICE : 2.68 CBOE : 5.48
Total Revenue (TTM) ICE : $13.08B CBOE : $4.79B
Gross Profit (TTM) ICE : $8.93B CBOE : $2.50B
EBITDA (TTM) ICE : $7.05B CBOE : $1.87B

Return for Risk

ICE vs. CBOE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICE

ICE Risk / Return Rank: 7
ICE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
ICE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
ICE Omega Ratio Rank: 9
ICE Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
ICE Martin Ratio Rank: 4

CBOE

CBOE Risk / Return Rank: 69
CBOE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
CBOE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
CBOE Omega Ratio Rank: 67
CBOE Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
CBOE Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICE vs. CBOE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) and Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ICE	CBOE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.98	1.01	-1.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.26	1.45	-2.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	1.20	-0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.82	1.11	-1.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.59	5.44	-7.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ICE vs. CBOE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICE Sharpe Ratio is -0.98, which is lower than the CBOE Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICE and CBOE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ICE	CBOE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.98	1.01	-1.99
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29	0.92	-0.64
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53	0.69	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	0.66	-0.24

Drawdowns

ICE vs. CBOE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICE drawdown since its inception was -73.94%, which is greater than CBOE's maximum drawdown of -43.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICE and CBOE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ICE	CBOE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.94%	-43.23%	-30.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.87%	-24.69%	-1.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.87%	-24.69%	-1.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.32%	-24.69%	-9.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.32%	-43.23%	+8.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.55%	-23.40%	-2.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.46%	-11.40%	-5.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.38%	5.02%	+8.36%

Volatility

ICE vs. CBOE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) is 5.89%, while Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE) has a volatility of 15.60%. This indicates that ICE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBOE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ICE	CBOE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.89%	15.60%	-9.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.45%	23.74%	-5.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.84%	27.02%	-5.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.05%	23.17%	-2.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.20%	25.32%	-3.12%

Dividends

ICE vs. CBOE - Dividend Comparison

ICE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, more than CBOE's 1.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CBOE Cboe Global Markets, Inc.	1.03%	1.08%	1.21%	1.18%	1.56%	1.38%	1.68%	1.12%	1.19%	0.83%	1.30%	1.36%
ICE Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.	1.41%	1.19%	1.21%	1.31%	1.48%	0.97%	1.04%	1.19%	1.27%	1.13%	1.21%	1.13%

Financials

ICE vs. CBOE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. and Cboe Global Markets, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ICE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.89B and revenue of 3.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.8%.

CBOE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cboe Global Markets, Inc. reported a gross profit of 669.90M and revenue of 1.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.6%.

ICE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.67B and revenue of 3.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 45.4%.

CBOE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cboe Global Markets, Inc. reported an operating income of 505.60M and revenue of 1.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 39.7%.

ICE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. reported a net income of 1.41B and revenue of 3.67B, resulting in a net margin of 38.5%.

CBOE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cboe Global Markets, Inc. reported a net income of 385.70M and revenue of 1.27B, resulting in a net margin of 30.3%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ICE and CBOE in my portfolio?

ICE and CBOE have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ICE or CBOE?

CBOE has higher volatility (15.60%) compared to ICE (5.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICE dropped -73.94% vs CBOE's -43.23%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CBOE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.