PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICE vs. BTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ICE vs. BTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) and British American Tobacco p.l.c. (BTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICE achieves a -12.95% return, which is significantly lower than BTI's 11.67% return. Over the past 10 years, ICE has outperformed BTI with an annualized return of 11.91%, while BTI has yielded a comparatively lower 7.69% annualized return.


ICE

1D
1.12%
1M
-9.22%
YTD
-12.95%
6M
-13.36%
1Y
-20.60%
3Y*
10.22%
5Y*
5.87%
10Y*
11.91%

BTI

1D
1.51%
1M
-4.64%
YTD
11.67%
6M
12.20%
1Y
35.86%
3Y*
34.54%
5Y*
17.96%
10Y*
7.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICE vs. BTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
-12.95%9.92%17.46%27.12%-23.91%19.94%26.15%24.47%8.11%26.60%
BTI
British American Tobacco p.l.c.
11.67%65.81%35.44%-19.97%14.91%7.95%-4.73%42.97%-49.35%24.40%

Correlation

The correlation between ICE and BTI is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2005

0.24

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ICE:

$80.10B

BTI:

$136.67B

EPS

ICE:

$6.85

BTI:

£4.93

PE Ratio

ICE:

20.53

BTI:

9.44

PEG Ratio

ICE:

2.48

BTI:

0.35

PS Ratio

ICE:

6.15

BTI:

1.99

PB Ratio

ICE:

2.71

BTI:

2.13

Total Revenue (TTM)

ICE:

$13.08B

BTI:

£51.48B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ICE:

$8.93B

BTI:

£42.82B

EBITDA (TTM)

ICE:

$7.05B

BTI:

£20.34B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICE vs. BTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICE
ICE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
ICE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
ICE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICE Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

BTI
BTI Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
BTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTI Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
BTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTI Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICE vs. BTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) and British American Tobacco p.l.c. (BTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ICEBTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

1.26

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.80

2.62

-3.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.50

5.89

-7.39

ICE vs. BTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICE Sharpe Ratio is -0.95, which is lower than the BTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICE and BTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ICE vs. BTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICE drawdown since its inception was -73.94%, which is greater than BTI's maximum drawdown of -64.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICE and BTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICEBTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.94%

-64.11%

-9.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.87%

-13.75%

-12.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.87%

-13.75%

-12.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.32%

-29.94%

-4.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.32%

-56.00%

+21.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.75%

-6.57%

-18.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.46%

-12.93%

-3.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.74%

6.10%

+7.64%

Volatility

ICE vs. BTI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) is 6.26%, while British American Tobacco p.l.c. (BTI) has a volatility of 7.53%. This indicates that ICE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICEBTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.26%

7.53%

-1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.52%

18.39%

+0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.86%

22.78%

-0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.07%

21.16%

-0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.20%

24.20%

-2.00%

Dividends

ICE vs. BTI - Dividend Comparison

ICE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than BTI's 4.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTI
British American Tobacco p.l.c.
4.95%5.29%8.18%9.72%7.23%7.98%7.22%6.35%8.53%4.27%3.85%4.11%
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
1.39%1.19%1.21%1.31%1.48%0.97%1.04%1.19%1.27%1.13%1.21%1.13%

Financials

ICE vs. BTI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. and British American Tobacco p.l.c.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B20222023202420252026
3.67B
13.54B
(ICE) Total Revenue
(BTI) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. ICE values in USD, BTI values in GBP

ICE vs. BTI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. and British American Tobacco p.l.c. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%70.0%75.0%80.0%85.0%20222023202420252026
78.8%
83.4%
Portfolio components
ICE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.89B and revenue of 3.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.8%.

BTI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, British American Tobacco p.l.c. reported a gross profit of 11.30B and revenue of 13.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.4%.

ICE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.67B and revenue of 3.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 45.4%.

BTI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, British American Tobacco p.l.c. reported an operating income of 4.93B and revenue of 13.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.4%.

ICE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. reported a net income of 1.41B and revenue of 3.67B, resulting in a net margin of 38.5%.

BTI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, British American Tobacco p.l.c. reported a net income of 3.25B and revenue of 13.54B, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ICE and BTI have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTI has higher volatility (7.53%) compared to ICE (6.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICE dropped -73.94% vs BTI's -64.11%.

BTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICE and BTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer