ICDU.L vs. BUYZ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ICDU.L (iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and BUYZ (Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ICDU.L is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Discretionary Index, while BUYZ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. ICDU.L is passively managed, while BUYZ is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, ICDU.L returned 9.32%/yr vs -5.76%/yr for BUYZ. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ICDU.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for BUYZ.

Performance

ICDU.L vs. BUYZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICDU.L) and Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ICDU.L is traded in GBp, while BUYZ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BUYZ values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICDU.L achieves a -0.52% return, which is significantly higher than BUYZ's -14.16% return.

ICDU.L

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: -0.10%
• YTD: -0.52%
• 6M: 0.18%
• 1Y: 13.34%
• 3Y*: 14.04%
• 5Y*: 9.32%
• 10Y*: 13.79%

BUYZ

• 1D: 1.29%
• 1M: -1.05%
• YTD: -14.16%
• 6M: -16.23%
• 1Y: -12.61%
• 3Y*: 8.44%
• 5Y*: -5.76%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICDU.L vs. BUYZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ICDU.L iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	-0.52%	-0.77%	33.05%	35.72%	-29.67%	25.98%	35.50%
BUYZ Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF	-14.16%	0.95%	30.49%	32.18%	-43.84%	-18.62%	98.35%

Correlation

The correlation between ICDU.L and BUYZ is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.48
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2020	0.48

The correlation between ICDU.L and BUYZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

ICDU.L vs. BUYZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ICDU.L	BUYZ
Consumer Cyclical	97.6%	41.0%
Communication Services	1.3%	21.9%
Technology	0.8%	15.9%
Industrials	0.1%	4.7%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	6.1%
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	7.8%
Healthcare	-	0.7%
Real Estate	-	2.5%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

ICDU.L vs. BUYZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICDU.L

ICDU.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
ICDU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
ICDU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
ICDU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 22
ICDU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
ICDU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 22

BUYZ

BUYZ Risk / Return Rank: 4
BUYZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
BUYZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
BUYZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4
BUYZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
BUYZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICDU.L vs. BUYZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICDU.L) and Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ICDU.L	BUYZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.80	-0.58	+1.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.21	-0.65	+1.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	0.92	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.95	-0.43	+1.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.61	-0.84	+3.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ICDU.L vs. BUYZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICDU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is higher than the BUYZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICDU.L and BUYZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ICDU.L	BUYZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80	-0.58	+1.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44	-0.22	+0.67
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	0.17	+0.49

Drawdowns

ICDU.L vs. BUYZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICDU.L drawdown since its inception was -33.84%, smaller than the maximum BUYZ drawdown of -63.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICDU.L and BUYZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ICDU.L	BUYZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.84%	-63.51%	+29.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.03%	-29.75%	+15.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.64%	-29.75%	+2.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.84%	-58.32%	+24.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.81%	-43.03%	+37.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.67%	-35.83%	+28.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.10%	15.02%	-9.92%

Volatility

ICDU.L vs. BUYZ - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICDU.L) and Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) have volatilities of 5.13% and 5.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ICDU.L	BUYZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.13%	5.37%	-0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.59%	16.67%	-4.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.68%	21.84%	-5.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.06%	25.86%	-4.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.15%	28.69%	-8.54%

ICDU.L vs. BUYZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICDU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BUYZ's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

ICDU.L vs. BUYZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither ICDU.L nor BUYZ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BUYZ Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.77%
ICDU.L iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ICDU.L and BUYZ in my portfolio?

ICDU.L and BUYZ have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ICDU.L or BUYZ?

On fees, ICDU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ICDU.L or BUYZ?

ICDU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BUYZ.

What is the main difference between ICDU.L and BUYZ?

ICDU.L is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while BUYZ is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ICDU.L and 0.50% for BUYZ.