ICBMX vs. SBMBX
ICBMX (ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund) and SBMBX (Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials Fund) are both Energy Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, ICBMX returned 12.44%/yr vs 2.18%/yr for SBMBX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ICBMX charges 1.31%/yr vs 3.30%/yr for SBMBX.
Performance
ICBMX vs. SBMBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
Over the past 10 years, ICBMX has outperformed SBMBX with an annualized return of 12.44%, while SBMBX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.18% annualized return.
ICBMX
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -3.56%
- 6M
- 9.59%
- YTD
- 16.98%
- 1Y
- 31.06%
- 3Y*
- 18.62%
- 5Y*
- 14.12%
- 10Y*
- 12.44%
SBMBX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- -0.95%
- 3Y*
- 1.83%
- 5Y*
- 4.96%
- 10Y*
- 2.18%
ICBMX vs. SBMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICBMX ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund | 16.98% | 15.95% | 21.25% | 11.02% | 0.50% | 30.63% | 5.53% | 22.11% | -17.38% | 16.93% |
SBMBX Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials Fund | 0.00% | 5.05% | -7.25% | 6.28% | 19.60% | 25.58% | -19.21% | -0.96% | -18.00% | 8.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICBMX and SBMBX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1998 | 0.76 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ICBMX and SBMBX has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICBMX vs. SBMBX — Risk / Return Rank
ICBMX
SBMBX
ICBMX vs. SBMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund (ICBMX) and Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials Fund (SBMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ICBMX | SBMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.03 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.99 | 0.12 | +2.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.05 | 0.23 | +9.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ICBMX vs. SBMBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICBMX drawdown since its inception was -63.92%, smaller than the maximum SBMBX drawdown of -74.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICBMX and SBMBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICBMX | SBMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.92% | -74.35% | +10.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.10% | -5.66% | -4.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.49% | -25.34% | -1.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.49% | -26.66% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.18% | -65.48% | +17.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.39% | -31.22% | +26.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.82% | -28.69% | +10.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 2.82% | +0.18% |
Volatility
ICBMX vs. SBMBX - Volatility Comparison
ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund (ICBMX) has a higher volatility of 4.46% compared to Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials Fund (SBMBX) at 0.00%. This indicates that ICBMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBMBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICBMX | SBMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.46% | 0.00% | +4.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.33% | 2.01% | +11.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.04% | 9.77% | +10.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.70% | 20.52% | +0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.23% | 23.93% | -1.70% |
ICBMX vs. SBMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICBMX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is lower than SBMBX's 3.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICBMX vs. SBMBX - Dividend Comparison
ICBMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.55%, more than SBMBX's 2.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICBMX ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund | 8.55% | 10.01% | 17.24% | 7.07% | 11.07% | 1.32% | 0.32% | 1.55% | 21.58% | 1.19% | 0.53% | 7.78% |
SBMBX Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials Fund | 2.13% | 2.13% | 2.17% | 0.00% | 2.75% | 0.75% | 1.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICBMX and SBMBX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ICBMX has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to SBMBX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICBMX dropped -63.92% vs SBMBX's -74.35%.
ICBMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ICBMX and SBMBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer