SBMBX vs. SIBPX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

SBMBX (Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials Fund) and SIBPX (Saratoga Investment Quality Bond Portfolio) are both mutual funds - SBMBX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Saratoga, while SIBPX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Saratoga. Over the past 5 years, SBMBX returned 5.34%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for SIBPX. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. SBMBX charges 3.30%/yr vs 1.54%/yr for SIBPX.

Performance

SBMBX vs. SIBPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials Fund (SBMBX) and Saratoga Investment Quality Bond Portfolio (SIBPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SBMBX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 2.30%
• 3Y*: 1.48%
• 5Y*: 5.34%
• 10Y*: 2.08%

SIBPX

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 0.52%
• YTD: -0.85%
• 6M: -0.75%
• 1Y: 2.48%
• 3Y*: 3.05%
• 5Y*: 1.10%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBMBX vs. SIBPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SBMBX Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials Fund	0.00%	5.05%	-7.25%	6.28%	19.60%	25.58%	-19.21%	-0.96%	-18.00%	15.95%
SIBPX Saratoga Investment Quality Bond Portfolio	-0.85%	6.50%	0.78%	2.90%	-2.51%	-1.73%	3.34%	3.84%	-0.72%	-0.13%

Correlation

The correlation between SBMBX and SIBPX is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.06
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2017	-0.04

The correlation between SBMBX and SIBPX shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (all time) to 0.06 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SBMBX vs. SIBPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBMBX

SBMBX Risk / Return Rank: 5
SBMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
SBMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
SBMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 5
SBMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
SBMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 5

SIBPX

SIBPX Risk / Return Rank: 8
SIBPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
SIBPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
SIBPX Omega Ratio Rank: 8
SIBPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
SIBPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBMBX vs. SIBPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials Fund (SBMBX) and Saratoga Investment Quality Bond Portfolio (SIBPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SBMBX	SIBPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.25	0.67	-0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.43	1.00	-0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.12	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.46	0.79	-0.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.89	2.15	-1.26

SBMBX vs. SIBPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBMBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is lower than the SIBPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBMBX and SIBPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SBMBX vs. SIBPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBMBX drawdown since its inception was -74.35%, which is greater than SIBPX's maximum drawdown of -5.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBMBX and SIBPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SBMBX	SIBPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.35%	-5.57%	-68.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.66%	-3.30%	-2.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.34%	-4.28%	-21.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.66%	-4.74%	-21.92%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-65.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.22%	-2.18%	-29.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.69%	-1.71%	-26.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.80%	1.21%	+1.59%

Volatility

SBMBX vs. SIBPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials Fund (SBMBX) is 0.00%, while Saratoga Investment Quality Bond Portfolio (SIBPX) has a volatility of 1.25%. This indicates that SBMBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIBPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SBMBX	SIBPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	1.25%	-1.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.20%	2.77%	+0.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.32%	3.87%	+6.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.60%	3.39%	+17.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.03%	2.76%	+21.27%

SBMBX vs. SIBPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBMBX has a 3.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SIBPX's 1.54% expense ratio.

Dividends

SBMBX vs. SIBPX - Dividend Comparison

SBMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, more than SIBPX's 2.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SBMBX Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials Fund	2.13%	2.13%	2.17%	0.00%	2.75%	0.75%	1.32%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SIBPX Saratoga Investment Quality Bond Portfolio	2.04%	2.24%	2.31%	1.54%	0.14%	1.39%	0.58%	0.99%	1.21%	1.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SBMBX and SIBPX in my portfolio?

SBMBX and SIBPX have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SBMBX or SIBPX?

SIBPX has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to SBMBX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBMBX dropped -74.35% vs SIBPX's -5.57%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SIBPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.67 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.