ICAP vs. DGRW
ICAP (Infrastructure Capital Equity Income ETF) and DGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - ICAP is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by InfraCap, while DGRW is a Quality Factor fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. ICAP is actively managed, while DGRW is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ICAP returned 15.47%/yr vs 13.97%/yr for DGRW. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ICAP charges 2.47%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for DGRW.
Performance
ICAP vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ICAP having a 8.65% return and DGRW slightly lower at 8.57%.
ICAP
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- 6M
- 4.76%
- YTD
- 8.65%
- 1Y
- 18.28%
- 3Y*
- 15.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.08%
DGRW
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- 6M
- 6.01%
- YTD
- 8.57%
- 1Y
- 16.02%
- 3Y*
- 13.97%
- 5Y*
- 11.41%
- 10Y*
- 13.71%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.94%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $51.03M | $48.50M | $56.54M | |
| $705.93K | $687.44K | $943.59K |
ICAP vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICAP Infrastructure Capital Equity Income ETF | 8.65% | 15.77% | 14.83% | 8.82% | -10.10% | 1.08% |
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 8.57% | 12.17% | 16.98% | 18.66% | -6.33% | 0.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICAP and DGRW is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2021 | 0.75 |
The correlation between ICAP and DGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
ICAP vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ICAP
DGRW
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Utilities
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Financial Services
ICAP
DGRW
Consumer Cyclical
ICAP
DGRW
Technology
ICAP
DGRW
Utilities
ICAP
DGRW
Industrials
ICAP
DGRW
Energy
ICAP
DGRW
Consumer Defensive
ICAP
DGRW
Real Estate
ICAP
DGRW
-
Healthcare
ICAP
DGRW
Communication Services
ICAP
DGRW
Basic Materials
ICAP
DGRW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICAP vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank
ICAP
DGRW
ICAP vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Infrastructure Capital Equity Income ETF (ICAP) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ICAP | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.26 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 1.79 | -0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.14 | 7.25 | -1.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ICAP vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICAP drawdown since its inception was -24.20%, smaller than the maximum DGRW drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICAP and DGRW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICAP | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.20% | -32.04% | +7.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.66% | -8.30% | -2.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.31% | -16.21% | -4.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -1.31% | +0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.59% | -3.00% | -4.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 2.05% | +0.77% |
Volatility
ICAP vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison
Infrastructure Capital Equity Income ETF (ICAP) has a higher volatility of 4.04% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) at 2.92%. This indicates that ICAP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICAP | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.04% | 2.92% | +1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.52% | 8.33% | +2.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.55% | 10.44% | +3.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.06% | 14.01% | +4.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.06% | 16.18% | +1.88% |
ICAP vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICAP has a 2.47% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICAP vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison
ICAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.93%, more than DGRW's 1.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 1.28% | 1.43% | 1.55% | 1.74% | 2.15% | 1.78% | 1.93% | 2.20% | 2.42% | 1.71% | 2.13% | 2.18% |
ICAP Infrastructure Capital Equity Income ETF | 9.93% | 8.89% | 8.30% | 8.65% | 8.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICAP and DGRW have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ICAP has higher volatility (4.04%) compared to DGRW (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICAP dropped -24.20% vs DGRW's -32.04%.
On 3-year performance, ICAP leads with 15.47% vs 13.97% for DGRW. On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DGRW has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ICAP has performed better with a 15.47% return vs 13.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 2.47% for ICAP.
ICAP has the higher dividend yield at 9.93%, compared with 1.28% for DGRW.
ICAP is categorized as Derivative Income, while DGRW is Quality Factor. They also come from different issuers: InfraCap and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 2.47% for ICAP and 0.28% for DGRW.
DGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ICAP and DGRW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer